Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3602U"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I believe Jason Lam's edits on the TT deployments by service pages are all fake. I believe 189 actually have some perm B9TLs. Same goes for 66. What do you think? --[[User:TIB965Z|TIB965Z]] ([[User talk:TIB965Z|talk]]) 10:29, 25 June 2016 (SGT) | I believe Jason Lam's edits on the TT deployments by service pages are all fake. I believe 189 actually have some perm B9TLs. Same goes for 66. What do you think? --[[User:TIB965Z|TIB965Z]] ([[User talk:TIB965Z|talk]]) 10:29, 25 June 2016 (SGT) | ||
:Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers. | |||
Revision as of 19:37, 25 June 2016
May 2016
Is samtlk's information on SgForums accurate? You also revert my edit? SBS3107Htalk 19:36, 29 May 2016 (SGT)
Reply
..
Hi.
Do you know anything about SMB1367X? Someone said it got involved in an accident and being laid out, but I am not sure about this.
SMB1368T
Reply
TT edits
Good morning,
I believe Jason Lam's edits on the TT deployments by service pages are all fake. I believe 189 actually have some perm B9TLs. Same goes for 66. What do you think? --TIB965Z (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2016 (SGT)
- Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers.