Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS9631X"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Ad legend==
Hi,


Regarding the subject itself, I think it is advisable to include a legend for full-body ads on SMRT buses. I just saw SMB1532K's ad and found out that it is a full-body version (with those 3D props), which leads me to the conclusion that these kinds of ads still exist because of this. Should I make a new legend (FL) for that therefore?
SMB1368T
== Sorry for all the undoing, hope you understand ==
Hi,
I understand you have had a busy time editing the pages, and would like to apologise for the undoing of pages, but 118alex's edits do have errors such as SBS5M and some other buses in the Citaro pages. The Citaro Batch 2 is a particularly difficult page to work with if the deployments are erroneous and hence I chosen to undo it so that it doesn't affect the Buses in depots section when the correct info comes in.
Sorry for all these trouble but hope you understand. :)
--Scania 17:47, 5 September 2016 (SGT)
==Aug 2017==
Hi.<br>Thank you. I apologise for creating such a huge trouble for the both of you.
==Hi==
hi,
may i know where do you all get the info of bus deployments & advert info from??
TheFlyingDutchman
==new ad==
hi
a bus plying 156 was seen with new kfc ad jn, but am unsure of the rego, do help check it out. thanks.
ad is <br>'''PS & B:''' KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken) Singapore - KFC Hawaiian Double Down Burger: Stop Looking! Don't Miss The Bus.
==Service 27==
Hi, as of now, the confirmed ones are all previous 112 merc buses. As of the others, i can guarantee 6076T and 6726B are a confirmed bus seen doing 27 for 4 days. As of the rest, 6813 and 6802 are the ones that i am not sure of. But, i kinda seen the stix with 2 digits, of which 6813 and 6802 are both 3 digits owner, 151 and 115
Confirmed list:
6076T, 6124M, 6238T, 6637A, 6638Y, 6640P, 6726B, 6831E, 6846M, 6869Y
Suspected buses:
Edit done: 6802P, 6813H (I cant see stix clearly but its 2 digits.)
Edit not done, but spotted since monday or tuesday: 6870S, 6616K
Another thing i need to clarify, today, i only saw 2 S115 buses performing S115 when its supposed to be 3. Is it 2 total buses or 3 total buses?
~ SBS3720L
==Reply==
Hi,
I was not in any facebook group regarding your query.
I understand your frustration regarding unability to edit. Please seek the site owner for upgrading of permission as I had no right over it.
In the meantime, you may use the talk pages of individual pages to suggest what to be ediyed and any administrator will do it for you if happen to chance upon or use my talk page and I will update for you.
For this matter, I will waived/ignore all charges as stated in Chapter 5 Paragraph 4 of the rule and feel free to request.
Thanks and regards
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|18 Oct 2017|19:19}}
===Add On===
Hi SBS9631X.
Regarding about this:<br>
:''And I see that someone (SMB315C) has protested against seemingly me using the term 'original fleet size' on Service Deployment pages to make it clearer when there are extra / missing buses for services involved?''
I would like to clarify that I am definitely not protesting against you for using the 'original fleet size' term. I merely left out that part in the guidelines pages, where it is optional to add in 'original fleet size' when changes are being made to the fleet (extra/missing buses). You can also make any changes to the guidelines if you think it is/they are unacceptable. Thank you for your kind understanding.
==Reply==
Hi
First, by reverting it back now would cause those disruptive editors to be able to create another new account (bypassing the system) and edit. But definitely I will revert it back at a later date. Regarding my point on asking the site owner to upgrade of your permission is, I cannot add you as an administrator and only the site owner can.
The total fleet size had been reflected in the top table (previously in the heading) all those while and is not recommended/compulsory to add it in the notes session. Of course editors always don't tally the number of bus and anyhow whack, which you can always report them for disruptive editing.
I hope this clarify the point/stance.
Thanks & Regards
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|18 Oct 2017|20:43}}
== Did you spot SMB3585U? ==
Did you spot SMB3585U? If the bus has the current gapless SMRT logo, please let me know accordingly.
--[[User:118 alex|118 alex]] ([[User talk:118 alex|talk]]) 20:10, 22 November 2017 (+08)

Revision as of 21:56, 1 January 2018

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&oldid=405734"