Difference between revisions of "SgWiki:Renaming of Bus Models (Poll/Discussion)/1"
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
~ SMB315C | ~ SMB315C | ||
Syafiq,Yes i do agreed but again the engine is Euro VI. | |||
About the ND323F i would agreed with Litlah suggestions.Even the NL323F Euro VI should be classified that way else it would create confusion. | |||
SG1815Y got a big 265 poster at the windscreen but again the editor disagreed with me.I am a BC of 17 years experience having working all 4 operators before. |
Revision as of 02:01, 28 March 2020
Poll Result
SgWiki talk:Renaming of MAN ND323F (Poll/Discussion)
Starter Post
May I suggest labelling the A95 Batches by emissions, in a way like the K230UBs?
ie. Euro V Batch 1 (currently Batch 1): SMB5888H (Euro V Demonstrator); SMB5889E - SMB5904U
Euro V Batch 2 (currently Batch 2): SG5740C - SG5799J
Euro V Batch 3 (currently Batch 3): SG5800M - SG5920A
Euro VI Batch 1 (currently Batch 4): SG2017C (Euro VI Demonstrator) SG5921Y - SG6171M
Euro VI Batch 2 (currently Batch 5): SG6172K onwards
Such labelling allows to easily differentiate: - Specifications (SMRT for Euro V; LTA for Euro VI) - Euro VI buses being purchased in different orders from Euro V counterparts
Other changes include: - SG2017C labelled as Euro VI Demonstrator, carrying identical chassis specifications to newer Euro VI units and hence labeled under "Euro VI Batch 1" instead.
I hope this suggestion can open an discussion, within administrators as well as users to open up comments on personal viewpoints, thanks.
--Litlah
Your Opinion Below
Opinion 1
I support this change as it can be an opportunity to be standardised in a similar way as SBS Transit's Scania K230UBs, which are classified in the same manner.
The only doubt I have is about the classification of SG2017C as the Euro VI MAN ND323F demonstrator as it is not really considered a demonstrator. I am not sure what other people may think, but it sounds weird to classify that as a demonstrator. Nonetheless, I fully support this renaming exercise for the MAN ND323Fs.
~ Themystery
Opinion 2
It is completely unnecessary to rename them according to their emissions.
SG2017C is ordered under the same batch as SG5800M - SG5920A with a different set of internal specifications.
The bus should not be labelled as a Euro VI demonstrator since it carries the same bodywork as the later batch 3 units (SG5830B - SG5920A) with the same interior specifications.
~ SMB315C
Syafiq,Yes i do agreed but again the engine is Euro VI. About the ND323F i would agreed with Litlah suggestions.Even the NL323F Euro VI should be classified that way else it would create confusion. SG1815Y got a big 265 poster at the windscreen but again the editor disagreed with me.I am a BC of 17 years experience having working all 4 operators before.