Difference between revisions of "User talk:Alphabetlorefan1"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
Hi,
Hi,


I would like to seek your opinion on the following proposed changes:
Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.


1. Launch of sgWiki Bus Spotting Page
To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.
A new page will be created daily and automatically deleted a month later. For example, "Bus Spotting/1 February 2025" would be removed on 1 March 2025. This page is intended to allow editors to document bus registration numbers without the typical edit limitations, enabling infinite edits.


The primary objective is to encourage collaboration among editors and to improve the accuracy of bus deployment data in relation to their permanent services. Many users have noted that the deployment page contains inaccurate and outdated information. By using these pages, we aim to track bus operations more effectively and allocate the correct permanent services, without requiring editors to board the buses to verify duty schedules.
Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: [[Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)]]. Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.


2. Use of Subpages for Bus Model Deployment
As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: [[Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1]], incorporating your valuable feedback.
I have received considerable feedback, mostly criticism, regarding the separation and consolidation of bus advertisements across models. Most complaints focus on advertisement changes rather than deployment accuracy, which contributes to the aforementioned inaccuracies. As such, I propose reorganising the Bus Model deployment using subpages as follows:


Example: Volvo B9TL (WEG Batch 2) will be divided into four subpages:
Please confirm if the following criteria are met:
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 1 – (Low Entry, SBS7700T – SBS7729L)
# Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 2 – (Low Floor, SBS3000G – SBS3099Y)
# Ease of information references.
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 3 – (Low Floor, SBS3100B – SBS3199S)
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 4 – (Low Floor, SBS3200X – SBS3238M & SBS3269Z)


A navigation bar will be added at the top and bottom of each page, linking the respective subpages. Each page will feature a single table listing up to 100 buses, organised in the following format:
If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.
 
Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment
 
This approach seeks to balance different perspectives, and to be more mobile friendly, as I am uncertain why some users are strongly opposed to these changes.
 
Alternative Table Layouts:
# Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Maintain status quo)
# Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order, maintain status quo)
# Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order)
 
Please let me know your thoughts on these proposals. Thank you for your time and feedback.


Regards, Supernutorcrazy
Regards, Supernutorcrazy

Revision as of 14:40, 25 January 2025

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy

Thanks

Opinion

Hi,

Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.

To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.

Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2). Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.

As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1, incorporating your valuable feedback.

Please confirm if the following criteria are met:

  1. Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
  2. Ease of information references.

If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.

Regards, Supernutorcrazy

Concern regarding SBS6709B on routes 129 and 293

I edited the page because someone informed me that he was in a Discord server where a user once claimed that SBS6709B was always seen on route 129 instead of route 293, and that they take route 129 everyday.

Please check again on your edits. Thanks. GyecheonSageori (aka Gye) (talk,) 14:15, 31 December 2024 (+08)

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=653608"