User talk:Hearmeout: Difference between revisions
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Hi | Hi | ||
I notice a possible edit warring that may appear due to different opinion. | |||
Let me share my few cents and see how you can come into concensious before the edit warring appears. | Let me share my few cents and see how you can come into concensious before the edit warring appears. | ||
Other editors had mention that the following groups are interchangeable, meaning it can appear on any services within the group: | |||
* 61, 172, 983, 991 | * 61, 172, 983, 991 | ||
* 176, 190 | * 176, 190 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
The term interchangeable means that such bus are duty-roastered on these group of service, most likely weekly basis, meaning this week bus A appear perm on 61, next week bus A then perm 172 and so on and so forth. | The term interchangeable means that such bus are duty-roastered on these group of service, most likely weekly basis, meaning this week bus A appear perm on 61, next week bus A then perm 172 and so on and so forth. | ||
Based on | Based on other editors daily description, they mention that it was randomly appearing on those group and not other service which indicate that it was not a spare bus. | ||
I do notice that TTS deployment are somewhat of what | I do notice that TTS deployment are somewhat of what they describe, for example, TTS 963, 965, 969 belongs to the same group. 169, 856 belongs to the other group, meaning buses that appear on 169 may appear on 856 randomly, bus seldom on other services. | ||
As such, do you think is possible where SMRT KJ practice FD like AMDEP in the past, with service grouping like I explain? | As such, do you think is possible where SMRT KJ practice FD like AMDEP in the past, with service grouping like I explain? | ||
Revision as of 08:07, 21 May 2025
Regarding 61, 172, 983 and 991 buses
Hello, with regards to your message in Shinjuku184's talk page, I want to make this clear. Buses that perm 61 they are both intercheangeable with 172, 983 and 991 buses. Does this mean you can remove the line that says Service 61, Service 172, Service 983 and Service 991 buses are interchangeable? Me and Shinjuku184 have worked so hard to spot the buses and believe the truth on deployments. I suggest you go to Choa Chu Kang Bus Interchange an observe any of the 61 perm buses do 172, 983 and 991.
Secondly, with regards to the message you wrote on my talk page on 12 August 2024 saying "Please stop adding nonexistent arrangement thanks", you sure its a false deployment? I also worked hard to know that Service 180, 188, 972/M and 979 buses are interchangeable because I spotted it every time. Please know it's not that hard to go out and bus spot all the time.
RobloxXF
Information
Hi,
I saw your edit for 975 which remove the following lines:
Due to earlier height limitations along Lim Chu Kang Road, double-decker buses were not deployed along the full route before 10 March 2019. Additionally, because of the narrow road at Lim Chu Kang Road articulated buses were not deployed along the full route as they were unable to make a U-turn at Police Coast Guard. To cater to increased demand for soldiers booking in on Sunday and public holiday nights, articulated buses were regularly deployed on short-trip service 975B between 2016 and 2022, until double-decker buses were introduced to replace them.
I find this important and information, where it inform the historical deployment limitation to make it more all rounded rather than focusing on the "now" like linking so and so only. Maybe you wish to correct the facts ot see how to integrate it in?
Regards Supernutorcrazy (talk) 07:53, 21 May 2025 (+08)
Bus Deployment (KJDEP services)
Hi
I notice a possible edit warring that may appear due to different opinion.
Let me share my few cents and see how you can come into concensious before the edit warring appears.
Other editors had mention that the following groups are interchangeable, meaning it can appear on any services within the group:
- 61, 172, 983, 991
- 176, 190
- 180, 188, 972/M, and 979
The term interchangeable means that such bus are duty-roastered on these group of service, most likely weekly basis, meaning this week bus A appear perm on 61, next week bus A then perm 172 and so on and so forth.
Based on other editors daily description, they mention that it was randomly appearing on those group and not other service which indicate that it was not a spare bus.
I do notice that TTS deployment are somewhat of what they describe, for example, TTS 963, 965, 969 belongs to the same group. 169, 856 belongs to the other group, meaning buses that appear on 169 may appear on 856 randomly, bus seldom on other services.
As such, do you think is possible where SMRT KJ practice FD like AMDEP in the past, with service grouping like I explain?
I do highly also believed that SMRT WLDEP also do pratice such grouping deployment.
Regards
Supernutorcrazy (talk) 08:06, 21 May 2025 (+08)