User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions
→Autoblock ID #32161: Removing as it is already updated |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
While I cannot edit, here are some things that are updated as of 26 Jun 2025 which will be edited at a later date: | While I cannot edit, here are some things that are updated as of 26 Jun 2025 which will be edited at a later date: | ||
Revision as of 20:32, 27 June 2025
About Me
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:
- No spamming
- Be respectful to me
- Do not type any nonsense messages
- If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
- Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.
Thanks
SBS8215X, SBS8217R & SBS8218M
Hi, Sorry about this for I put AWBDR because I do observed that got several buses layup about few days or a week before the actual deregistration date. I will take note of the observation first before putting AWBDR next time. Thanks.
Noted. Regards,
CurryGreenLine (talk 17:20, 5 June 2025 (+08)
Sync of Bus Fleet Rule
Hi,
Please refer to this: SgWiki:Guidebook/sgWiki_Buses. The rule in enforced since early 2010s, and was governed by Apex-LW'21 and SMB315C. Punishment awarded is as followed:
- Apex-LW'21: Perma Ban
- SMB315C: Perma Ban
- Supernutorcrazy: Warning Point
Please do not accuse me as I am just enforcing the legacy rule. Like you mention, I do not have the right to repel this rule, but can streamline it to make it easier (reduces the number of pages to edit).
Regards
Supernutorcrazy (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2025 (+08)
Table
Was just testing out if its feasible to display the former fleet. Would be nice to display them if we had more information. If anything you may go ahead and take down the former fleet section. I'm fine with that too.
Autoblock ID
While I cannot edit, here are some things that are updated as of 26 Jun 2025 which will be edited at a later date: