Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Seiko Criteria ad. ==
==SgWiki Policies & Guidelines==


This ad. have 2 different version.1 is Wang Leehom as feat., 1 is Sammi Cheung as feat. Their captions also different, please help to clarify. Thanks!
Hi, SBS3107H, apologies in advance if I clear the entire previous talk page.<br>
([[User talk:SBS5032B]]) 13:13, 6 December 2013 (SGT)


== Re: Clarifications ==
As I realise that many are made unaware about their edits in sgWiki Buses section, I should come up with a draft of the sgWiki Policies & Guidelines that they have to follow. However, the previous bans that the admins did for offending members are made unaware of, ranging from Inserting false information, removing content from pages, etc.<br>


With regards to Svc 961,
Though sgWiki is a page where "anyone can edit", just like Wikipedia, it can, at the same time, be possible to abuse to vandalise, insert false information and so on where prohibited. Because these guidelines are not enforced here, there could be some members who would edit whichever is prohibited and got caught on by the admins.<br>


1) Batch 2 MAN A22 registered will usually follow a trend that they will perm a service chronologically in order. Given SMB1342S and SMB1344L perm WL961, high chance SMB1343P perm WL961 too.
===SgWiki Buses Guidelines===
1. All deployment pages should be updated constantly without any errors. If there is any error spotted in the pages, they should be rectified or reverted. Unconfirmed deployments updated in advance which is not taken effect from the date will be reverted immediately and resulted in a temporary ban for first-time offences. This is to prevent the reflection of incorrect information in the respective deployment pages.<br>


2) SMB1343P has been on doing Svc 961 for 2 months.
2. Do not make unnecessary changes to the table format (this includes the table in other bus-related pages such as [[De-registration of Buses]]), such as unwanted integrating of information or de-integration which can cause confusion to other users. The table should not be messed up in any form after the updating, such as the table alignment, etc. The integration of the "Notes" column (across all bus deployment pages) and the "advertisements" in the BSEP bus model deployment pages (since BSEP buses does not get any other advertisements as the mainstream production fleet) is acceptable.<br>


3) TIB481C has been running around on other services lately like a spare bus, just that it only returns on 961 for the past 2 weekends.
3. Do not make unnecessary merging of any bus article or to merge a deployment list into one page. Doing so is deemed unnecessary which can cause confusion to other users.<br>


Source of info: "Singapore Bus Enthusiasts" FB Group. Please don't tell me you don't trust FB sources and only trust those from SGF. At the very least look through arguments carefully.
4. For Bus Advertisements, it is advisable that the full naming of the advertisement be identified even before posting up. Necessary changes should be made to ensure accuracy.<br>


As for SMB129Z, my original source has been invalidated. Hence, I will only revert edits related to TIB481C and SMB1343P.
5. When updating bus redeployments in the respective deployment articles, users will also have to update the deployments by service, former deployments, the buses in depots and the spare buses.<br>


[[User talk:ArthurJie]] 12:58, 8 December 2013 (SGT)
6. When updating retired buses (such as lay up and de-registering of buses), users will also have to update the deployment pages, deployments by service, former deployments, the buses in depots, non-revenue buses and the spare buses (if any). The deployment page should not contain "Lay Up", "Awaiting Deregistration" or "De-registered" as it defeats the purposes since its not necessary to put up.<br>


Nope, I'm just asking you to reverify with TIB1051D again. Quoted from FB: "481C still need confirmation, doing duty 10 doesn't mean it's still perm... it only appeared on 961 for the past 2 weekends!"
7. When updating newly-registered buses, they are to be updated in the deployments page. The registration numbers of the buses in the Specifications section in the respective deployments page, the [[Bus Lifespan Expiry Date]] and the [[Singapore Bus Fleet]] should also be updated. The admins will update the main pages of the deployments main page (i.e. [[SBS Transit Bus Deployments]] and [[SMRT Bus Deployments]].)


[[User talk:ArthurJie]] 13:07, 8 December 2013 (SGT)
8. When updating de-registered buses, they are to be updated after 2359 hours of the actual de-registration date of the bus. They are not allowed to be updated before the timing as the list will be reverted back if it is updated too early or before the stipulated time.<br>


: I have given a note to TIB1051D and will await a reply from him. [[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 13:38, 10 December 2013 (SGT)
8. If a newly purchased bus is being identified to the depot where the bus is posted to, the pages should be updated accordingly, whereby the buses in depots page should reflect the buses based in the depots.<br>


:: I agree with what ArthurJie mentioned. SMB1343P was indeed deployed on 961 for 2 consecutive months, while TIB481C deployment may be WLDEP SP//961*. But I will also help check on both buses on 961 these days to confirm their deployments.
9. BSEP buses are not deemed spare buses. As BSEP is an exclusive or fixed deployment, the buses should not be marked as "SP" at all times.<br>
::[[User:SMB1341U|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U|talk]]) 15:45, 10 December 2013 (SGT)


== Clarifications - SV 961 ==
10. For the [[History of Bus Services]] list and the relevant bus history pages, though they are not monitored closely, may have to be updated so long that the information of the service changes is taken effect at a particular date. However, false information on history of bus services may still be reverted if the changes were not taken effect on the day itself or no known changes within the date as concerned.<br>
 
Hi, just to provide some clarifications about the current deployments of this service.
 
I don't see a point of arguing over deployments. For there is always a clear line of difference between what is planned to be done (rostered / scheduled permanent buses), versus the actual situation (actual deployment of buses). These 2 are controlled by two different parties, one side being the scheduler, and the other being the starter of the depot or ONP venue.
 
I have been aware of SMB1343P's consistency on SV 961, I'm seeing it regularly. However, what goes inside the scheduled list in the roster is TIB481C, which as of today, is still valid.
 
I have my reason for editing SMB1343P out of the list, and TIB481C back into the list. Unless it can be verified on paper that SMB1343P is indeed in SV 961, through roster, through waybill or whatever means which is in black and white, otherwise it will not hold valid.
 
Please feel free to pose me questions onboard SgForums (ID: TIB1051D) or onboard Facebook (Christopher Thian). Thank you!
 
==Bodywork assembler==
Can you help me to answer [[Talk:Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 1)#Bodywork assembler|this question here]] please? No one answer this yet...<br>
Thank you!<br>
[[User:Lim2|Lim2]] ([[User talk:Lim2|talk]]) 16:55, 22 December 2013 (SGT)
 
 
==Volvo B9TL Wright Batch 3==
Hi Good Evening,<br>
 
Just to let you know that SBS3766E, which is posted to SLBP, is using the Hanover EDS, not LECIP EDS. Please take note. Thanks.<br>
 
UPDATE: SBS3761T also gets the Hanover EDS.<br>
 
--[[User:Apex-LW&#39;21|Apex-LW&#39;21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW&#39;21|talk]]) 20:15, 28 March 2014 (SGT)
 
==SMRT Shortworking Trip Services==
Good Evening,<br>
 
Please note that the terminating trips (E) of Intra-Town Services, i.e. 307E, 811E, 911E, 912E, 913E are not considered short-working trips.<br>
I have removed the above list from the [[SMRT Shortworking Trip Services]].<br>
 
--[[User:Apex-LW&#39;21|Apex-LW&#39;21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW&#39;21|talk]]) 21:51, 24 May 2014 (SGT)
 
: Noted. [[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 00:44, 26 May 2014 (SGT)

Revision as of 19:45, 5 June 2014

SgWiki Policies & Guidelines

Hi, SBS3107H, apologies in advance if I clear the entire previous talk page.

As I realise that many are made unaware about their edits in sgWiki Buses section, I should come up with a draft of the sgWiki Policies & Guidelines that they have to follow. However, the previous bans that the admins did for offending members are made unaware of, ranging from Inserting false information, removing content from pages, etc.

Though sgWiki is a page where "anyone can edit", just like Wikipedia, it can, at the same time, be possible to abuse to vandalise, insert false information and so on where prohibited. Because these guidelines are not enforced here, there could be some members who would edit whichever is prohibited and got caught on by the admins.

SgWiki Buses Guidelines

1. All deployment pages should be updated constantly without any errors. If there is any error spotted in the pages, they should be rectified or reverted. Unconfirmed deployments updated in advance which is not taken effect from the date will be reverted immediately and resulted in a temporary ban for first-time offences. This is to prevent the reflection of incorrect information in the respective deployment pages.

2. Do not make unnecessary changes to the table format (this includes the table in other bus-related pages such as De-registration of Buses), such as unwanted integrating of information or de-integration which can cause confusion to other users. The table should not be messed up in any form after the updating, such as the table alignment, etc. The integration of the "Notes" column (across all bus deployment pages) and the "advertisements" in the BSEP bus model deployment pages (since BSEP buses does not get any other advertisements as the mainstream production fleet) is acceptable.

3. Do not make unnecessary merging of any bus article or to merge a deployment list into one page. Doing so is deemed unnecessary which can cause confusion to other users.

4. For Bus Advertisements, it is advisable that the full naming of the advertisement be identified even before posting up. Necessary changes should be made to ensure accuracy.

5. When updating bus redeployments in the respective deployment articles, users will also have to update the deployments by service, former deployments, the buses in depots and the spare buses.

6. When updating retired buses (such as lay up and de-registering of buses), users will also have to update the deployment pages, deployments by service, former deployments, the buses in depots, non-revenue buses and the spare buses (if any). The deployment page should not contain "Lay Up", "Awaiting Deregistration" or "De-registered" as it defeats the purposes since its not necessary to put up.

7. When updating newly-registered buses, they are to be updated in the deployments page. The registration numbers of the buses in the Specifications section in the respective deployments page, the Bus Lifespan Expiry Date and the Singapore Bus Fleet should also be updated. The admins will update the main pages of the deployments main page (i.e. SBS Transit Bus Deployments and SMRT Bus Deployments.)

8. When updating de-registered buses, they are to be updated after 2359 hours of the actual de-registration date of the bus. They are not allowed to be updated before the timing as the list will be reverted back if it is updated too early or before the stipulated time.

8. If a newly purchased bus is being identified to the depot where the bus is posted to, the pages should be updated accordingly, whereby the buses in depots page should reflect the buses based in the depots.

9. BSEP buses are not deemed spare buses. As BSEP is an exclusive or fixed deployment, the buses should not be marked as "SP" at all times.

10. For the History of Bus Services list and the relevant bus history pages, though they are not monitored closely, may have to be updated so long that the information of the service changes is taken effect at a particular date. However, false information on history of bus services may still be reverted if the changes were not taken effect on the day itself or no known changes within the date as concerned.