Difference between revisions of "User talk:SMB1368T"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi dude, | Hi dude, | ||
I | Firstly, I apologise for being too insensitive if it seemed so to you. True that, I'm quite a straightforward person both online & offline, so sometimes people perceive me in ways which I don't intend to be. In any case, those who know me long enough will know that I'm typically just trying to bring constructive points across to the other party. | ||
Anyway, i've seen many other amateur users both on the Groups, Forums & here posting nonsensical stuff. That's why I tend to be more skeptical (& critical perhaps) towards edits made by relatively new users here. | |||
I'm not sure if you had seen the messy phase here on Wiki about 2-3 years back. At that time, there were countless nonsensical edits made by numerous new users here on Wiki, screwing up all the perm statuses, buses listed on the individual pages, and even the advertisements. And alot of new users too who started posting 'Insider Redeployments Info' like depot transfers, before they even took place. | |||
And it took quite a few of us quite a long time to double-verify in person (eg, deployments, ad statuses), & then re-edit back the necessary info on Wiki. That was when the Sgwiki editing guidelines came about in proper. And it irks me alot to see new users start posting nonsensical stuff without referring to longstanding formats or inputting false information, because that means the rest of us have to verify in person or otherwise, and clean up the mess made by those users again. | |||
In any case, my point is, as long as you & other new users can post constructive stuff & follow proper formatting, I see no issues with you guys. That would be way better instead of other new users who seem to edit back & forth the deployment statuses of certain buses (I think you'll know a few of these troublemakers). If you guys (the newer users) can post constructive stuff that will benefit the community in general, (instead of, let's say, cleaning up the mess for certain users), that is good & all I ask for. | |||
But so far, you seem like quite a reliable user for edits, so you did gain my trust. | |||
I'm not sure if you had added me on FB, or if you know who I am on FB, but let me know, you seem like a reliable junior to have. Just take my perspective & story (as above I've typed) into consideration & maybe, process it. It'll explain alot. Cheers. | |||
- SBS9631X | - SBS9631X | ||
Revision as of 00:05, 8 October 2015
Hi dude,
Firstly, I apologise for being too insensitive if it seemed so to you. True that, I'm quite a straightforward person both online & offline, so sometimes people perceive me in ways which I don't intend to be. In any case, those who know me long enough will know that I'm typically just trying to bring constructive points across to the other party.
Anyway, i've seen many other amateur users both on the Groups, Forums & here posting nonsensical stuff. That's why I tend to be more skeptical (& critical perhaps) towards edits made by relatively new users here.
I'm not sure if you had seen the messy phase here on Wiki about 2-3 years back. At that time, there were countless nonsensical edits made by numerous new users here on Wiki, screwing up all the perm statuses, buses listed on the individual pages, and even the advertisements. And alot of new users too who started posting 'Insider Redeployments Info' like depot transfers, before they even took place. And it took quite a few of us quite a long time to double-verify in person (eg, deployments, ad statuses), & then re-edit back the necessary info on Wiki. That was when the Sgwiki editing guidelines came about in proper. And it irks me alot to see new users start posting nonsensical stuff without referring to longstanding formats or inputting false information, because that means the rest of us have to verify in person or otherwise, and clean up the mess made by those users again.
In any case, my point is, as long as you & other new users can post constructive stuff & follow proper formatting, I see no issues with you guys. That would be way better instead of other new users who seem to edit back & forth the deployment statuses of certain buses (I think you'll know a few of these troublemakers). If you guys (the newer users) can post constructive stuff that will benefit the community in general, (instead of, let's say, cleaning up the mess for certain users), that is good & all I ask for.
But so far, you seem like quite a reliable user for edits, so you did gain my trust.
I'm not sure if you had added me on FB, or if you know who I am on FB, but let me know, you seem like a reliable junior to have. Just take my perspective & story (as above I've typed) into consideration & maybe, process it. It'll explain alot. Cheers.
- SBS9631X