Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"
Apex-LW'21 (talk | contribs) (clearing talk page (refer to view history tab for archived talk page)) |
(→Regarding the New Format: new section) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21|talk]]) 17:29, 22 November 2015 (SGT) | --[[User:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21|talk]]) 17:29, 22 November 2015 (SGT) | ||
== Regarding the New Format == | |||
Hello, | |||
Just wanted to ask why the Tower Transit services pages have a different format from the rest. | |||
And about the title of the services pages, [[Services 41, 49, 66, 77, 78, 79, 96, 97 & 98/98M]] and [[Services 106, 143/143M, 173, 177, 183 & 189]], I feel that they are too long and won't appear too good in search engines. I understand that people may take "Services 41 - 98" as SBST services and "Services 106 - 189" as SMRT Bus Services though, so maybe including the operator at the front could be a workaround? [[Tower Transit Services 41 - 98]] and [[Tower Transit Services 106 - 189]] | |||
Want to hear your opinions :) | |||
--[[User:SBS3602U|SBS3602U]] ([[User talk:SBS3602U|talk]]) 01:00, 29 May 2016 (SGT) |
Revision as of 01:00, 29 May 2016
Service 258
Good Afternoon SBS3107H,
Please note that Service 258, which was introduced under the BSEP serving within Jurong West estate is not classfied under the Jurong Industrial Services. Only Services 246 - 257 are under the Jurong Industrial Services.
Inform the users editing sgWiki to not merge Service 258 deployment & history information over to Jurong Industrial Services classfication.
Thanks.
--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2015 (SGT)
Regarding the New Format
Hello,
Just wanted to ask why the Tower Transit services pages have a different format from the rest.
And about the title of the services pages, Services 41, 49, 66, 77, 78, 79, 96, 97 & 98/98M and Services 106, 143/143M, 173, 177, 183 & 189, I feel that they are too long and won't appear too good in search engines. I understand that people may take "Services 41 - 98" as SBST services and "Services 106 - 189" as SMRT Bus Services though, so maybe including the operator at the front could be a workaround? Tower Transit Services 41 - 98 and Tower Transit Services 106 - 189
Want to hear your opinions :)