|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| In my perspective, a variant is a bus that has many distinct characteristics from another bus under the same bus model. This applies to a demonstrator as well. | | In my perspective, a variant is a bus that has many distinct characteristics from another bus under the same bus model. This applies to a demonstrator as well. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Voicing out my second debate.
| |
| | |
| In the previous renaming debate, I have provided reasons on why the Scania K230UB batches should still be exceptionally classified by Euro emissions. However, I also stated my objections on the ND323F A95/NL323F A22 renaming solely and mainly because of the specifications of SG2017C. Other users have also pointed out the concern about SG2017C's classification as well.
| |
| | |
| With reference to admin Supernutorcrazy's puzzlement with the example of the A22, I would have agreed that A22 batches can be classified by Euro emissions as there is no A22 with MAN Lion City Hybrid bodywork having Euro VI emissions.
| |
| | |
| If admin Supernutorcrazy has in mind that standardisation needs to take place, I will also like to provide my school of thought with reference to admin SMB315C's opinion during the 1st round of discussion.
| |
| | |
| "We will discuss and reconsider about this matter when the registration of the 50 3-Door Euro 6 A95s commence."
| |
| | |
| This leaves us thinking about how SG5999Z should be reclassified as it is registered alone with Euro V emissions. Same applies to SG2017C. As of now, I would find it very hard to get a good standardisation of the A95s. Where do I start? I will try to put a draft classification here even though I doubt many people would agree with it. On a side note, I think there is no choice but to classify SG2017C as a demonstrator if standardisation must take place, since it is the first Euro VI public bus.
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (Demonstrators)''' -- SMB5888H, SG5999Z, SG2017C
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (Euro V Batch 1)''' -- SMB5889E - SMB5904U
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (Euro V Batch 2)''' -- SG5740C - SG5799J
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (Euro V Batch 3)''' -- SG5800M - SG5920A
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (Euro VI Batch 1)''' -- SG5921Y - SG6171M
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (Euro VI Batch 2)''' -- SG6172K onwards
| |
| | |
| '''MAN ND323F (3-door)''' -- Production batch for 3-door A95s, assuming everyone knows that all of them are Euro VI and gets used to the classification.
| |
| | |
| This is just what I think in a scenario where standardisation of fleet classification has to take place, in which however, I don't think standardisation across all model pages is possible and each model has a different scenario in specifications and batch registrations. I hope this opinion can help convey what I mean.
| |
|
| |
|
| ~ Wekelwrady | | ~ Wekelwrady |
Dear editors,
Regarding to the previous debate on renaming, please give your opinion on what constitute as a variant below.
Your Opinion Below
Opinion 1
I may not be able to convey my thoughts in a better way, but I will do my best to pen down my opinion here.
In my perspective, a variant is a bus that has many distinct characteristics from another bus under the same bus model. This applies to a demonstrator as well.
~ Wekelwrady