Difference between revisions of "User talk:962"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:


I don't see why user 'TIB832Z' deserve such remarks when you were the one who missed out the former deployments.
I don't see why user 'TIB832Z' deserve such remarks when you were the one who missed out the former deployments.
Thanks & regards
== Former deployments ==
Hi.
This is not the first time you missed out editing former deployments. Don’t make other users edit former deployments when you’re supposed to sync and do it yourself. This is part of sgwiki guidelines. And don’t think you can anyhow throw offensive remarks to whoever undo your edit because you are the one who is in the wrong. This is no place to fool around. Anymore childish behaviour from you I will report to admin.


Thanks & regards
Thanks & regards

Revision as of 08:56, 23 July 2022

Regards to SG5605K and SG6268T

Hi there,

I don't usually observe route 25 on a regular basis as I don't live along this route. Maybe you can observe further and/or check with other bus spotters living along the route of bus 25? Anyways, the CDGEs that permed 25 are not due for early retirement for now unless there are reliable sources to validate this.

Regards,
Razerboii.

Reminder

Hi.

Please be mindful of your words when editing.

I don't see why user 'TIB832Z' deserve such remarks when you were the one who missed out the former deployments.

Thanks & regards

Former deployments

Hi.

This is not the first time you missed out editing former deployments. Don’t make other users edit former deployments when you’re supposed to sync and do it yourself. This is part of sgwiki guidelines. And don’t think you can anyhow throw offensive remarks to whoever undo your edit because you are the one who is in the wrong. This is no place to fool around. Anymore childish behaviour from you I will report to admin.

Thanks & regards