Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dragomir7"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Hi, I was wondering what if for the history pages, what if we combined it into the pages like: *2021 *2023 *2025 instead of transclude to the main page, with the main history page becoming chronological order?") |
(reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==History== | |||
Hi, | Hi, | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
instead of transclude to the main page, with the main history page becoming chronological order? | instead of transclude to the main page, with the main history page becoming chronological order? | ||
— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]], 03:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC) | |||
:@[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]]: I think that would be too much work, because most services' routes don't actually change that much across years so if you want to take snapshots every year there will be a LOT of duplication for services. The way the pages log the changes to each service right now is fine, if only a bit too colourful for my liking (I liked the old text-only version better, with at most some bus op logos). | |||
:If you intend to log route changes, the most that you could do would be to follow what landtransportguru has on [https://landtransportguru.net/singapore-public-bus-timeline-2020s/3/ their page], but as a standalone article; combining it into each year article would make it way too cluttered. At most just put a link in the year article. | |||
:Just my two cents. (Also you might want to consider signing your comments with four tildes "~".) [[User:Dragomir7|Dragomir7]] ([[User talk:Dragomir7|talk]]) 12:00, 7 March 2025 (+08) |
Revision as of 12:00, 7 March 2025
History
Hi,
I was wondering what if for the history pages, what if we combined it into the pages like:
instead of transclude to the main page, with the main history page becoming chronological order? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supernutorcrazy, 03:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Supernutorcrazy: I think that would be too much work, because most services' routes don't actually change that much across years so if you want to take snapshots every year there will be a LOT of duplication for services. The way the pages log the changes to each service right now is fine, if only a bit too colourful for my liking (I liked the old text-only version better, with at most some bus op logos).
- If you intend to log route changes, the most that you could do would be to follow what landtransportguru has on their page, but as a standalone article; combining it into each year article would make it way too cluttered. At most just put a link in the year article.