User talk:RobloxXF

Welcome to my talk page

Hello, sgWiki users, welcome to my page. Before you can me a message in my talk page, I advise you to read the rules for my talk page first

Rules

1. Use the new topic if you want to start a message
2. Any harassment messages will be deleted
3. No typing in all caps
4. If you did not add this format == xxx ==, that means I dont know what topic are you talking about
5. If I sent the same message to different people like username 1 & 2, your message must come like this:
   == Re: xxx ==
   === from (username 1) ===
   Your message
   === from (username 2) ===
   and so on.
   Heres an example of how this should be formatted

If I did not reply, sorry I was busy doing with other stuff

From Hearmeout

Please stop adding nonexistent arrangement thanks

Re: 184 and 302 bendies

From Shinjuku184

Hi from my observation the 184 and 302 bendies are very likely to be interchangeable but I'll continue to keep an eye on them. As for 176 and 190, I have seen A95 E6 B2 and B9TL from 190 running on 176 but that was a while back.

Re: Hi for the 302 bendies, 8024 and 8034 were operating for the past few weeks but they seem to have returned to 184 and replaced by 8032. Random DDs like 6025C (301) has been running on 302 instead of bendies recently.

From TIB1152X 190

Most of the time, bendies seem to be in their respective perm services.

Also, if you realise, 190 and 190A morning Peak seems to have bendy crossover, not sure is from 184 or 302.

Interchangeable for DDs seem to be common between 176 and 190 but not really on 184. I would say 5018C act like a spare bus these days. Didn’t really see the crossover of 190 buses to 184 on Weekdays but other crossover from 190 exist such as 190x302, 190x180, 190x868E and 190x991 etc.

From Alphabetlorefan1

Hi, I dont think 184 and 302 bendies are interchangeable, but hopefully it might be, unless otherwise stated. I will observe it again at a later date. Also, with the 176 and 190 DDs, it is indeed interchangeable, I have seen these perm buses doing the reverse services at some days. Thanks.

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 21 August 2024, 19:00

Bus Service 991

Hi,

I am certain you go out during Off-Peak hours which explains why you didn’t see 991 SDs. There are 2 perm duties of 991 which is done by SDs, of which 1 of them perform crossover to Bus Service 975A in the evening. They depart CKI to Bukit Batok at 0800++ hours stretch of timing. 991 have never receive any downgrades/upgrades and neither did their schedule change.

Re

Hi,

You may refer to this two pages for more information.

• SgWiki:Manifesto 2025
• User:Supernutorcrazy/sgWiki Buses Improvements FAQ

About SMB244Z

Can you tell me when this permed 300? I have never seen it. If you think its wrong, I hope admin can revert your edit.

Thanks

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 7 March 2025, 19:21

Regarding New Bus Service Pages

Hi,

You might want to refer to Talk:Bus Deployments by Service for more information on how you can help completely. As work is extremely hectic, we need fully complete pages in order to make bus service pages as much presentable as possible. Your full cooperation is appreciated.

Thanks and Regards

Photo upload

Are the photos that you have recently uploaded yours? If not, I suggest you credit the original owner with a link instead of stealing the picture by cropping out the watermark.

Images of buses

I agree with what Hearmeout said about you uploading photos. Its either you took a photo of yourself or you take it from other website and upload it here without credit. Not that, you also tried to crop out images to hide the watermarks, especially the ones from Singapore Buses Facebook account, in which people have already credited the image you uploaded. I suggest you take photos of buses like how Alphabetlorefan, TTEDC and Wekelwrady did. I will leave CastJared to send several images of buses taken from camera by 3 users mentioned and hope you will understand. Take note

Here's the Example of Mine:

There is a summary there: https://www.flickr.com/photos/zinyew/50718954756/ @ Flickr

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

• Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

• Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Add-on

This file, SG3123Y 86.jpg you uploaded has no credit. Where is the credit for this file? This file comes from another website. Please know its not that hard to credit when uploading. Also did you not read Hearmeout and InquisitorViolator7533 message on this topic?

Thanks

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 5 May 2025, 18:15

Explanation about Edit wars

An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions. Editors engaged in a dispute should reach consensus or pursue dispute resolution rather than edit war. Edit warring is unconstructive, creates animosity between editors, makes consensus harder to reach, and causes confusion for readers. Users who engage in edit warring risk being blocked or even banned. An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.

There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot will usually be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to the three-revert rule, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons; see below for details. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.

Autoblocks

Hi,

Autoblocks on the wiki exist to prevent banned users from creating new accounts and continuing their disruptive edits.

I understand how frustrating these autoblocks can be, particularly when they are triggered by the reappearance of previously blocked users. I’ve been doing my best to lift these autoblocks promptly and reapply the original block with the autoblock function disabled.

I appreciate your understanding that I may not be able to monitor the situation 24/7.

Regards,

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2025 (+08)

Bus Stop Displaying

When you take bus services often, you see different passengers asking more questions. Some of them are not understood well or ignored by passers-by or even bus captains. There is also an issue with how reader would not even take notice of the Hide/Unhide button to understand more about the bus service, some don't even click at all. What if the passenger is surprised "the bus journey took longer than expected" "thought the MRT/landmarks shown me a direct route"?

The bus stops unhidden not only have landmarks, but also gives slight traces on how the bus routes look like. The unhidden stops would make a reader interested to click on the Hide/Unhide button and know more about a bus route. It also reduces any awkward interaction when asking for directions.