User talk:Supernutorcrazy
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
- Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
- Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
- Please do not ask for permission to do something.
- Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
- When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
- Affected sections code
- Advertisement in full
- Affected parts to change in details.
- Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
- Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
- I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.
Leave your message below
Rail Wiki Expansion
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
Re: Bus Template
Speaking of the recent changes just now, I have also thought of the same complication before while I was creating the alternate method pages. I was also wondering whether seperate templates catering to each bus service would be possible? To put it this way, like one template it's SBST 76, then the operator colour (purple) for 76. Then when the operator changes the operator colour gets changed in the template for the particular bus service, and there wouldn't be a need to make revisions on other pages. What do you think abt this idea? Or if not I will stick to your current implementation. (P.S. I didn't find the current texture of the bus template to be appealing to the eye but issok)