User talk:Apex-LW'21

From SgWiki
Revision as of 22:38, 7 October 2014 by SBS3107H (talk | contribs) (Note)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to my talk page!

Please post on my user talk page (not my user page) if you want me to delete any outdated / unrelated articles or any unused images existed in sgWiki. Also, please provide the links to the uploaded images (if any) when requesting to delete the articles.

I will review the pages first before I will delete, but however, should any of the pages that requires cleanup or is sufficiently related, it will not be deleted, unless there is a reason to believe that the article is the above-mentioned. Pages (including its talk page of a current page) which are blanked out, unanswered or remained for a certain prolonged period will be deleted in the event of any routine house-keeping or cleanup in sgWiki.

If your account is mistakenly banned due to posting of false or unrelated information, etc, please ask the administrator who had originally banned you by writing on the user's talk page to appeal, unless if you are mistakenly banned by me. If an information is mistakenly marked as false statement, you had to clarify with the administrator and provide justification that the information is true and accurate. However, the decision will be made by the administrator and the decision of the appeal is final, after the investigation is complete.

Do note that the successful appeal of the ban (only for those accounts banned by me) can only be done once. Once the ban appeal is successful, you are to comply with the sgWiki Guidelines. Appeals for repeated bans will not be considered.

The appeal procedures will also apply to the warning points imposed to the account.

If any articles or uploaded photos are deleted by mistake, please use my talk page to appeal. Please note that any deleted articles/photos will be subjected to further review and decision. This appeal only applies to articles/photos that were previously deleted by me. If you wish to appeal on any articles/photos that were previously existed in sgWiki that were deleted by any other administrators, please write on the respective talk pages.

Any accounts that are in severe violation of the sgWiki Guidelines will not be unbanned. Please ensure that all edits and articles are complied with the sgWiki Guidelines.

If your account is being affected by any Autoblock function caused by the user being blocked for spam advertising, etc, please use my talk page so that I can remove the Autoblock.

For any Captcha issues, please refer to the administrator 'Jason' by writing on his talk page.

For bus-related pages, if you find any mistakes in any pages (only those edited by me), please use my talk page to point out the mistakes and clarify with me. I will make the necessary corrections as soon as possible.


Hello

I may not have spoke to you before but it seems that this user timoteus11 is messing up the deployments of Service 92 and pulling out the current perms onto it. It could be another user that might be banned doing this issue. Seems like another user is also basing his 'edits' and correcting it on the other pages. I do know that 6721P and 6771U are perms on 16 and 48. 6721P has an ad still on sv16 today etc. Could you look into this issue? Many thanks. -Neon

Reply

For this user - Timoteus11, it seems to me that he's a newcomer to sgWiki. I can't really tell from the pattern of his edits whether if the user is previously banned from editing is attempting to create and use his alternate account to continue editing the page.

As for the Service 92 deployments, he may need to physically check out the fleet to verify the status (such as the perm sticker/marking on the bus to identify its perm), instead of just giving a 'wild guess' or to assume that the bus is perm. Also, he has to refrain from editing the status if he does not exactly know or unsure about the current fleet situation.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 06:56, 7 October 2014 (SGT)

October 2014

I just realised there is a typo for SgWiki:Guidelines#SgWiki Buses No. 4 for the word, "capitalised" in the second sentence. It is written as "captialised".

SBS3107H (talk) 22:38, 7 October 2014 (SGT)