User talk:SG5064X
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
979/M
Hi
I was thinking that it doesn't make sense to combine 979 & 979M together because they were introduced as 2 different svcs.. Fleet deployment may be like 859/A/B, but unlike svc 859A/B, 979M have its own number plate at bus stops..
plus it will create mess aka confusion since we have to explicitly state whats 979 and 979M eg..
- Service 979M will use any 2 979 MAN NL323F Buses Daily.
- Duty 979AP08 & Duty 979AP09 for Weekday and Duty 979AP07 & Duty 979AP08 for Weekend run as 979M.
What do you think? Cheers --SMB3163D (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2017 (+08)