User talk:CurryGreenLine

!	Warning Point (15 April 2025)					!
	You have committed the follow offense that may warrant an immediate ban: Disruptive editing You have received this warning for disruptive editing, based on recent contributions to the following pages: Bus Service 240, 246, 251, and 253. Your edits have repeatedly affected article clarity by: Breaking proper paragraph structure Introducing ambiguous or fragmented sentences In your user page, your statement: "Don’t put explanations that are unnecessary. If explanations doesn’t make sense nor linked, it will be deleted immediately." …suggests an unwillingness to collaborate or consider community feedback. This is not how content decisions are made on this wiki. We encourage consensus, discussion, and clarity — not unilateral changes based on personal judgment. While this warning reflects behavior that could warrant a ban, it is not an immediate penalty. It is meant to inform you of the severity of the issue and give you a chance to adjust your editing approach. Future contributions should aim to: Improve structure and clarity, not reduce it Discuss contested edits on talk pages Avoid dismissive or vague statements in edit summaries or user pages Continued disruptive behavior may result in further administrative action, including a block or ban. However, if you choose to work collaboratively, you are welcome to continue contributing constructively.

Hi, this is CurryGreenLine, a permanent editor for the West Area. More info will be on the ‘User Page’. Before editing the ‘Discussions’ page, please follow these conditions.

• Be mindful of your words.
• Don’t put explanations that are unnecessary.
• If explanations doesn’t make sense nor linked, it will be deleted immediately.
• If you have any opinions, feel free to discuss it here.
• If there were mistakes involved, please state it in detail.

Depot	Fleet Size	Fleet
Depot	The fleet size	(Number of Single Deckers buses based on fleet size) Single Deckers	(Number of Double Deckers buses based on fleet size) Double Deckers	(Number of Articulated buses based on fleet size) Articulated

Images

Hi, good to see you having a batch of buses you uploaded, however some of your images, with the landtransportguru watermark images in the middle can still be copyright. Due to that, you can see by my quotes LTG images are copyright for some reasons and many people complaining about it.

RE

Hi CurryGreenLine,

Thanks for your reply. I understand that you’ve put in effort to explain things and that you didn’t mean any offence. Likewise, I don’t mean to offend you either — my original message was meant as constructive feedback, but I admit the tone might have come across more direct than intended.

To clarify where I was coming from: my feedback wasn’t aimed at your grammar or spelling, even though it may have sounded that way. What I actually wanted to highlight was more about the structure, logical flow, and clarity in how the information is presented.

Here are a few specific points that raised the concerns which I had to revert your edits:

1. Paragraphing and readability
   When everything is placed into a single block of text, it's hard for readers to follow the logic or separate different points. Breaking your explanation into clear paragraphs can really help with this.
2. Sentence structure and flow
   A lot of your edits use short, direct sentences like “Linking to EW27 Boon Lay station, Travel along Tah ching Road.” While that can work in certain contexts, it often makes the write-up sound abrupt or robotic. It may also weaken the explanation because the logic or background information is missing.
3. Ambiguity and focus
   Most of the phrasing in your edits can be unclear or vague, which makes it hard to understand the intent. For example, the way “alternative route” was described could be interpreted in several ways, which is why I suggested a clearer rewording.

I completely get that explaining bus routes and their functions is complex — especially with the feeder/industrial/trunk classification — and it’s not always easy to phrase it perfectly. I also recognize I’m not perfect in English either in my earlier message (i.e. Supernutorcrazy is not perfect in English), but I always try to focus on clear, logical presentation — and I hope that this time, my message would came through better.

At the end of the day, we're all here to improve the page and help readers understand the content better.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 07:57, 15 April 2025 (+08)