Difference between revisions of "User talk:8549H"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
According to your logic, with so many pending changes and unknown details about CR151 and by creating that page, what about CJ151, C851E etc.? I purposefully deleted and remove those page because nothing had been finalized. Not even an actual train set had been manufactured. How can we be that sure? Just like how bus models page was created after the first vehicle come into registration, train model will follow the same, with page name (future) being listed instead of hyperlink or created.
== Recent Edits ==
Hi,


== BNDEP Citaros ==
I have some doubts with regards to your recent edits


Hi there,
1. The 55x410W crossovers are still seen consistently, including today.<br>
2. Can I ask what services the 63xx citaros have been seen on this week, since you said they are not for 53?<br>
3. While I have seen 6011E and 6095M on 54 multiple times, are they really perm 54 (and likewise 6670, 6671, 6751 for 53)? I still saw 6011 on 53 as well as 6670, 6671 on 54 over the past few weeks. You may want to kiv that further.


Understand you technically reverted my edits on the redeployments on some of the BNDEP Citaros.
(Reply)<br>
Noted your observations, thanks!


From what some of my friends observed in the wake of the redeployments, 6878X is now perming 293, and 1125E is perming 14.
== BNDEP 7 & 35 swaps ==


As a result, is it possible to clarify why you believe the above deployments did not took place?
Hi, have noticed your edits on the fleet swaps between Services 7 and 35. However, I noticed last Thursday at 6pm that there was this BNDEP A95 on Service 7 that changed the display from 7 to 35 while it was going to end its trip in Bedok Int. Got a feeling that there are some crossover/interlining duties between both services, do check to see if it is true. Thanks!


Thanks and regards
==Reply ==
Have observed and there is no interlining duties. The ex sv7 man dds are run full day on sv35. It could be a coincidence since sv35 is almost full fleet man dds. There is no interlining duties on sv7a/b as observed


AirFan19
== Re: ==
Hi,


Update: Thanks for clarifying, will take note next time
I am an administrator involving sgWiki Rail sections, as such I am unable to ban Draconite Dragon without a solid proof.
 
In regards to your claim, Can you provide
 
(1) a list of services does SBS3937D perform throughout the month?
 
(2) a proof of SG5849Z in a car accident in June, showing its rego plate clearly
 
(3) a list of services does SBS6155Z perform throughout the month?
 
(4) In regards to excess bus and total number, can you provide which service does the user edited for me to review the history?
 
Otherwise, you may procceed to ask the other sgWiki editor.
 
Thanks & Regards

Latest revision as of 18:21, 9 July 2023

Recent Edits[edit]

Hi,

I have some doubts with regards to your recent edits

1. The 55x410W crossovers are still seen consistently, including today.
2. Can I ask what services the 63xx citaros have been seen on this week, since you said they are not for 53?
3. While I have seen 6011E and 6095M on 54 multiple times, are they really perm 54 (and likewise 6670, 6671, 6751 for 53)? I still saw 6011 on 53 as well as 6670, 6671 on 54 over the past few weeks. You may want to kiv that further.

(Reply)
Noted your observations, thanks!

BNDEP 7 & 35 swaps[edit]

Hi, have noticed your edits on the fleet swaps between Services 7 and 35. However, I noticed last Thursday at 6pm that there was this BNDEP A95 on Service 7 that changed the display from 7 to 35 while it was going to end its trip in Bedok Int. Got a feeling that there are some crossover/interlining duties between both services, do check to see if it is true. Thanks!

Reply[edit]

Have observed and there is no interlining duties. The ex sv7 man dds are run full day on sv35. It could be a coincidence since sv35 is almost full fleet man dds. There is no interlining duties on sv7a/b as observed

Re:[edit]

Hi,

I am an administrator involving sgWiki Rail sections, as such I am unable to ban Draconite Dragon without a solid proof.

In regards to your claim, Can you provide

(1) a list of services does SBS3937D perform throughout the month?

(2) a proof of SG5849Z in a car accident in June, showing its rego plate clearly

(3) a list of services does SBS6155Z perform throughout the month?

(4) In regards to excess bus and total number, can you provide which service does the user edited for me to review the history?

Otherwise, you may procceed to ask the other sgWiki editor.

Thanks & Regards

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:8549H&oldid=584880"