Difference between revisions of "User talk:Litlah"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thanks. | Thanks. | ||
=== Reply === | |||
Hi, I have noted and acknowledged your message, thanks for the feedback with regard to the selection of sources. | |||
== Incomplete edit == | == Incomplete edit == | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 20 August 2020
Selection of files
Hi.
I appreciate your time and effort to update the bus model display pictures and crediting them back to the respective owners.
I believe there's many more sources out there for you to search from, other than Land Transport Guru.
Also, please refrain from updating them every few months just for the sake of showcasing a new display image.
Thanks.
Reply
Hi, I have noted and acknowledged your message, thanks for the feedback with regard to the selection of sources.
Incomplete edit
Hi.
Can you kindly explain where's your subsequent edits after this?
FYI, Sv139 redeployment is more or less settled, leaving 5207P as the remaining KUB perm in the fleet.
Reply
Hi, SBS5215R has been on 139 for the past 2 weeks. For SBS5051X and SBS5236E, I do no see it as often as the other two K230UBs, hence I think leave SBS5051X and SBS5236E as BRBP SP, but SBS5215R as BRBP 139. And for SBS5207P, is there any supported evidence? FYI, I reside along Sv139's route so therefore I am keeping track of Sv139 in the recent and upcoming weeks so I would appreciate if I could constructively support information with regard to the redeployments involving Sv139. Thanks.