Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Remove Message requesting ban for false deployment (bus) <-- Please find alternative admins Thanks)
(319 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==suggestion (20/9/17)==
==Leave your message below==
===(Files)===
{|class="wikitable"
!Delete
!colspan=2|Reason
!Note
|-
|(File:102 (Medium).jpg) & (File:SLRT.JPG)
|rowspan=2|Poor lighting quality
|Pictures of other sets are available
|rowspan=4|Do kindly check & relink images if necessary
|-
|(File:BPLRT 109.jpg)
|(File:Set 109.jpg) (Better quality)
|-
|(File:Set 116.jpg)
|colspan=2|Poor angle of picture
|-
|(File:NE8 RFP.png), (File: NE10 PTP.png), (File:NE11 WLH.png), (File:NE13 KVN.png), (File:NE14 HGN.png), (File: Senja.jpg), (File:Jelapang.jpg), (File:Segar.jpg), (File:Fajar.jpg), (File:BP2.jpg), (File:LorongChuanMap.png)
|colspan=2|Location of station on map is no longer needed in new sgWiki Train format
|}


== Application for declaration to classify 24 Citaros as Batch 2 instead of Batch 3. ==
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Greetings.
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Perhaps you may have forgotten, we once had a debate as to whether SBS Transit's Citaro Batch 2 have 24 extra buses back in November 2015 by exercising its "option". Now that all the Euro V Citaros from LTA and SBST side have been completed (culminating in a total number of 1,104 Citaros for these batches), I am led to the inference that what you said is the correct position. However, last year, another fellow user had suggested that SBS6819S-SBS6821J and SBS6509L-SBS6529D (total 24 buses) were under Batch 3 based on inference from chassis numbers, and successfully obtained leave from an administrator to reflect it as the current position. I do not doubt and had not previously suggested that his position is wrong, but at this stage I am seeking leave from you to overrule that position and shift the said 24 buses back to Batch 2, thus reflecting the correct position as follows:
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


Batch 2: 474 buses (SBS6342A-SBS6549X, SBS6600E-SBS6865H)<br>
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
Batch 3: 330 buses* (SBS2000M-SBS2004C, SBS6550R-SBS6599B, SBS6866E-SBS6893B, SG1000G-SG1071B, SG1080A-SG1245S, SG1691L-SG1699R)<br>
*The issue of whether to create separate pages for SBST and LTA batches is not before us currently, though it may be helpful to discuss about it as well.


Thank you.


--[[User:ASA1234|ASA1234]] ([[User talk:ASA1234|talk]]) 11:28, 28 December 2017 (+08)
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
 
Hi,
== Admin Rights Applications ==
Added
--[[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 14:41, 17 January 2018 (+08)
 
== Sync of Batch 2 Citaro's Former Deployments Data ==


Hi there,
I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.


I would like to highlight that, while we had all agreed on the classification of the Batch 2 Citaros, we have not actually synced the Former Deployments data for the particular bunch of Citaros (SBS6509L - SBS6529D)?
As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.


The Former Deployments data for that particular bunch of Batch 2 Citaros, are still listed in the Former Deployments page for the Batch 3 Citaros.
However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.  


Likewise, the Former Deployments page of the Batch 2 Citaro have not included in that bunch too yet. (and Former Deployments data = both the SBST section & GA section for the SBS6509L - SBS6529D bunch)
For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.


So, would like to seek some clarification on what to do / where to go about with this? Thanks & let me know!
I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.


Regards,
Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!
SBS9631X


==Locked Page Template==
===Wiki plans===
Hi Supernutorcrazy.
On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.


I have created a template <code><nowiki>{{Page Locked}}</nowiki></code> specially for active pages that are being locked.
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


Do add this template in after locking the pages.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


Thank you and I am sorry for any inconvenience caused to you.
== Concourse and exit layout WIP ==


== regarding errors and edits on information on Former Deployments of MAN ND323F (Batch 3)  ==
Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.


Hi,
Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.


After checking through the former deployments and what I have observed, SG5836K and SG5838E were actually first spotted doing 37 on Dec 2017, thus making the BNDEP 47 deployment as (Nov 2017 - Dec 2018). Thank you.
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Revision as of 16:07, 16 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Hi,

I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.

As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.

However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.

For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.

I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.

Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!

Wiki plans

On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Concourse and exit layout WIP

Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.

Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.

As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=609160"