Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Remove Message requesting ban for false deployment (bus) <-- Please find alternative admins Thanks)
(266 intermediate revisions by 37 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


== Google, Internet etc. search for train stations ==
==Leave your message below==
 
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Should there be an action taken to change in the station name pages to "MRT Station"/"LRT Station"? This is because when most people search for station names in eg. Google, the leading "MRT"/"LRT" wordings are always directly shown to them to choose the search results they want. Furthermore, the Sgwiki Train Staion pages are not on the first few pages of the search results of "XXX MRT", thus viewership for the Sgwiki train station pages may be low. Additionally, since the bus model pages of Sgwiki made it to their respective search results, I believe we can do the same thing to the train station pages, even though it may be time-consuming to change the page names and waiting for the train station pages to be on the first few search result pages.
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
 
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
Thank you and I look forward to hear your perspective on this issue.
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
 
Wekelwrady, 12.44pm, 5 Mar 2018
 
P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
 
== Regarding my edits ==
 
Hi, may I know the reason why my edits to [[North South Line]] were edited. It didnt to my knowledge violate any policy as it was not violating any copyright rules, was not vandalism or spam, is factually accurate, and was supported by references. Regards -[[User:TrainAddict|TrainAddict]] ([[User talk:TrainAddict|talk]]) 21:44, 1 July 2018 (+08)


== Suggestion==
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Hi Admin,


Do you have any suggestions to add for the pages I'm going to do?
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
Hi,


[[User:TIK TOK|TIK TOK]] ([[User talk:TIK TOK|talk]]) 16:25, 16 September 2018 (+08)
I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.


== One-north or one-north ==
As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.


hi,
However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.


will it be better to display One-north MRT Station and One-north station as one-north MRT Station & one-north station respectively? The name of the station does not have any caps in it, so maybe we should follow it?
For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.


-VE
I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.


== Query for deletion ==
Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!


Hi Supernutorcrazy,  
===Wiki plans===
On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.


Are there specific rules regarding requesting for deletion?(Because I was confused after seeing the block log of user SBS2X). If I missed out anything that I did not see in the guidebook, I sincerely apologise.
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


This is the following which I do not understand:
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


"Deliberate Vandalism: When requesting for deletion, always used the admin talk page or the Template:Deletion."
== Concourse and exit layout WIP ==


This is because I am unclear about what to do regarding deleting the Jurong page(which we are planning to replace it with Jurong East and Jurong West pages).
Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.


Thank you and I hope any misunderstanding can be solved.
Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.


Wekelwrady
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Revision as of 16:07, 16 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Hi,

I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.

As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.

However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.

For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.

I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.

Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!

Wiki plans

On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Concourse and exit layout WIP

Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.

Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.

As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=609160"