Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(332 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==suggestion (20/9/17)==
==Leave your message below==
===(Files)===
{|class="wikitable"
!Delete
!colspan=2|Reason
!Note
|-
|(File:102 (Medium).jpg) & (File:SLRT.JPG)
|rowspan=2|Poor lighting quality
|Pictures of other sets are available
|rowspan=4|Do kindly check & relink images if necessary
|-
|(File:BPLRT 109.jpg)
|(File:Set 109.jpg) (Better quality)
|-
|(File:Set 116.jpg)
|colspan=2|Poor angle of picture
|-
|(File:NE8 RFP.png), (File: NE10 PTP.png), (File:NE11 WLH.png), (File:NE13 KVN.png), (File:NE14 HGN.png), (File: Senja.jpg), (File:Jelapang.jpg), (File:Segar.jpg), (File:Fajar.jpg), (File:BP2.jpg), (File:LorongChuanMap.png)
|colspan=2|Location of station on map is no longer needed in new sgWiki Train format
|}


== Application for declaration to classify 24 Citaros as Batch 2 instead of Batch 3. ==
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Greetings.
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Perhaps you may have forgotten, we once had a debate as to whether SBS Transit's Citaro Batch 2 have 24 extra buses back in November 2015 by exercising its "option". Now that all the Euro V Citaros from LTA and SBST side have been completed (culminating in a total number of 1,104 Citaros for these batches), I am led to the inference that what you said is the correct position. However, last year, another fellow user had suggested that SBS6819S-SBS6821J and SBS6509L-SBS6529D (total 24 buses) were under Batch 3 based on inference from chassis numbers, and successfully obtained leave from an administrator to reflect it as the current position. I do not doubt and had not previously suggested that his position is wrong, but at this stage I am seeking leave from you to overrule that position and shift the said 24 buses back to Batch 2, thus reflecting the correct position as follows:
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


Batch 2: 474 buses (SBS6342A-SBS6549X, SBS6600E-SBS6865H)<br>
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
Batch 3: 330 buses* (SBS2000M-SBS2004C, SBS6550R-SBS6599B, SBS6866E-SBS6893B, SG1000G-SG1071B, SG1080A-SG1245S, SG1691L-SG1699R)<br>
*The issue of whether to create separate pages for SBST and LTA batches is not before us currently, though it may be helpful to discuss about it as well.


Thank you.


--[[User:ASA1234|ASA1234]] ([[User talk:ASA1234|talk]]) 11:28, 28 December 2017 (+08)
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


== Admin Rights Applications ==
Noted with the updated travelling time and the new MRT waiting times. I shall resume with the travelling time updates for alternative travel pages and reflect as much accuracy as possible. Thank you so much for the dedication!
Added
--[[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 14:41, 17 January 2018 (+08)


== Sync of Batch 2 Citaro's Former Deployments Data ==
On a side note, I have identified 40 existing stations for map upgrading to newer editions. Majority of these stations vary from complexity in navigation, to missing bus stop details, while the minority is just to upgrade as a batch of consecutive stations. I have also put in some notes on what can be modified as side reference on my user page. By the time this phase is completed, this would fulfill the target of having half of the total stations with upgraded maps. I will see what I can do to speed up this process while fulfilling quality at the same time.


Hi there,
The finalised Expo map (with details corrected, requesting deletion of old versions) will be my sample reference on the new specifications to look out for when I work on the rest.


I would like to highlight that, while we had all agreed on the classification of the Batch 2 Citaros, we have not actually synced the Former Deployments data for the particular bunch of Citaros (SBS6509L - SBS6529D)?
Thanks and Regards


The Former Deployments data for that particular bunch of Batch 2 Citaros, are still listed in the Former Deployments page for the Batch 3 Citaros.
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


Likewise, the Former Deployments page of the Batch 2 Citaro have not included in that bunch too yet. (and Former Deployments data = both the SBST section & GA section for the SBS6509L - SBS6529D bunch)
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
 
So, would like to seek some clarification on what to do / where to go about with this? Thanks & let me know!
 
Regards,
SBS9631X
 
==Locked Page Template==
Hi Supernutorcrazy.
 
I have created a template <code><nowiki>{{Page Locked}}</nowiki></code> specially for active pages that are being locked.
 
Do add this template in after locking the pages.
 
Thank you and I am sorry for any inconvenience caused to you.
 
== regarding errors and edits on information on Former Deployments of MAN ND323F (Batch 3)  ==
 
Hi,
 
After checking through the former deployments and what I have observed, SG5836K and SG5838E were actually first spotted doing 37 on Dec 2017, thus making the BNDEP 47 deployment as (Nov 2017 - Dec 2018). Thank you.

Revision as of 11:17, 28 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Noted with the updated travelling time and the new MRT waiting times. I shall resume with the travelling time updates for alternative travel pages and reflect as much accuracy as possible. Thank you so much for the dedication!

On a side note, I have identified 40 existing stations for map upgrading to newer editions. Majority of these stations vary from complexity in navigation, to missing bus stop details, while the minority is just to upgrade as a batch of consecutive stations. I have also put in some notes on what can be modified as side reference on my user page. By the time this phase is completed, this would fulfill the target of having half of the total stations with upgraded maps. I will see what I can do to speed up this process while fulfilling quality at the same time.

The finalised Expo map (with details corrected, requesting deletion of old versions) will be my sample reference on the new specifications to look out for when I work on the rest.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.