Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(→‎Re "858 DD": new section)
 
(292 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


== Google, Internet etc. search for train stations ==
==Leave your message below==
 
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Should there be an action taken to change in the station name pages to "MRT Station"/"LRT Station"? This is because when most people search for station names in eg. Google, the leading "MRT"/"LRT" wordings are always directly shown to them to choose the search results they want. Furthermore, the Sgwiki Train Staion pages are not on the first few pages of the search results of "XXX MRT", thus viewership for the Sgwiki train station pages may be low. Additionally, since the bus model pages of Sgwiki made it to their respective search results, I believe we can do the same thing to the train station pages, even though it may be time-consuming to change the page names and waiting for the train station pages to be on the first few search result pages.
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
 
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
 
 
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
 
Hi,  
 
I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.
 
I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.
 
Thanks and Regards


Thank you and I look forward to hear your perspective on this issue.
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


Wekelwrady, 12.44pm, 5 Mar 2018
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
== Re "858 DD" ==


== Regarding my edits ==
I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.


Hi, may I know the reason why my edits to [[North South Line]] were edited. It didnt to my knowledge violate any policy as it was not violating any copyright rules, was not vandalism or spam, is factually accurate, and was supported by references. Regards -[[User:TrainAddict|TrainAddict]] ([[User talk:TrainAddict|talk]]) 21:44, 1 July 2018 (+08)
AirFan19

Latest revision as of 20:21, 17 May 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.

I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Re "858 DD"[edit]

I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.

AirFan19

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=613732"