Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(243 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


== Are redirects counted as redundant as per [[SgWiki:Guidebook/Rules/Chapter 4]] ==
==Leave your message below==


Hi, I would like to clear my doubt if redirects are counted as redundant. As I plan to create station code redirects & line abbreviation redirects to the page. Eg:<br>NS1 > Jurong East station<br>EW24 > Jurong East station<br>JE5 > Jurong East station<br>NSL > North South Line.<br>I believe that the creation of these redirects will be of aid to editors &/or readers. [[User:Usurpation|Usurpation]] ([[User talk:Usurpation|talk]]) 22:21, 10 February 2019 (+08)
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Also I noticed a mistake on [[Template:Travel Advisory]]. Do change 010318 020318 to 010319 020319 for NEL early closure. [[User:Usurpation|Usurpation]] ([[User talk:Usurpation|talk]]) 23:15, 10 February 2019 (+08)
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


== Cross border lines ==
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


Hi, should we add in cross border lines of Singapore?? Which includes the current KTM Tebrau Shuttle, the future Kuala Lumpur–Singapore high-speed rail, Johor Bahru–Singapore Rapid Transit System & Kunming–Singapore railway
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


--Winbo


== User SBS3107H ==
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
Hi,  


== User SBS3107H ==
Mulled on the wording for Admiralty below.


to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
NS11: 962 Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long walking distance to Blk 680.


EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
NS12: 962->117/M 883/M Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long travelling journey to the station.


rgds
Would like to seek your opinion on such wording.
lemon1974


== usage of .svg ==
I will also likely revamp Admiralty map quite soon, unless the station shows any signs of upgrading navigation.


Hi, is it possible for you to enable the usage of .svg file type on sgWiki? Scalable Vector Graphics or svg supports expansion and compression of files so that a 400px file will look as clear as a 100px file. I tried to contact the site owner but his talk page is locked. If you are unable to implement the above change, can you please help me alert the site owner? Thank you. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]])
Thanks and Regards


== change ==
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


Hi, do help to change "officially opens" to "officially open" on [[:Template:Travel Advisory]] thank you.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Latest revision as of 15:31, 30 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

Mulled on the wording for Admiralty below.

NS11: 962 Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long walking distance to Blk 680.

NS12: 962->117/M 883/M Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long travelling journey to the station.

Would like to seek your opinion on such wording.

I will also likely revamp Admiralty map quite soon, unless the station shows any signs of upgrading navigation.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=611437"