Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Protection Level: new section)
 
(213 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--
== User SBS3107H ==
Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
== User SBS3107H ==
to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
rgds
lemon1974
== User Bus33333 & Tangabriel ==
Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you.
-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 31: Line 12:
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.
==Leave your message below==
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


==Snow Effects==
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi.
 
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
 
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


User 'SBS8478D' has kindly questioned me with regards to the recently implemented festive effects.


Is there any way for editors/users to disable this effect? It may affect their editing/viewing experience.
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


Thanks.
Hi,


== Protection Level ==
Mulled on the wording for Admiralty below.


Hi.<br />
NS11: 962 Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long walking distance to Blk 680.


This is with regards to the protection level of [[Template:Travel Advisory]].<br />
NS12: 962->117/M 883/M Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long travelling journey to the station.  


I do not understand why minor details that are corrected had warrant in a page being locked to a certain group of users.<br />
Would like to seek your opinion on such wording.  


Do you think that is reasonable? I do not think that is the case.<br />
I will also likely revamp Admiralty map quite soon, unless the station shows any signs of upgrading navigation.


I can understand the need for protection level of [[SgWiki:Unacceptable Username]] to be raised as it is supposed to be a rule.<br />
Thanks and Regards


If this action and/or query warrants in a ban of any length, I also believe that is going too far.
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


[[User:DarkNight|DarkNight]] ([[User talk:DarkNight|talk]]) 21:44, 11 December 2019 (+08)
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Latest revision as of 15:31, 30 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

Mulled on the wording for Admiralty below.

NS11: 962 Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long walking distance to Blk 680.

NS12: 962->117/M 883/M Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long travelling journey to the station.

Would like to seek your opinion on such wording.

I will also likely revamp Admiralty map quite soon, unless the station shows any signs of upgrading navigation.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=611437"