Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(209 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
== User SBS3107H ==
 
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
**Affected sections code
**Advertisement in full
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
==Leave your message below==


== User SBS3107H ==
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


rgds
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
lemon1974


== User Bus33333 & Tangabriel ==


Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you.
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


== Reply. ==
Hi,


Hi.
Mulled on the wording for Admiralty below.


I would like to first off, apologise for any rash acts. Could you leave some pointers for me to take note of?
NS11: 962 Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long walking distance to Blk 680.


"Protection Level are raised accordingly to the standard."
NS12: 962->117/M 883/M Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long travelling journey to the station.  


If the Travel Advisory page has been raised up to the normal standard as per mentioned, would it be more reasonable to remove the notice on the page since only Admins can edit it?
Would like to seek your opinion on such wording.


[[User:DarkNight|DarkNight]] ([[User talk:DarkNight|talk]]) 23:56, 11 December 2019 (+08)
I will also likely revamp Admiralty map quite soon, unless the station shows any signs of upgrading navigation.


-->
Thanks and Regards


Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
**Affected sections code
**Advertisement in full
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.

Latest revision as of 15:31, 30 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

Mulled on the wording for Admiralty below.

NS11: 962 Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long walking distance to Blk 680.

NS12: 962->117/M 883/M Remarks: You can take the NSLFBB due to the long travelling journey to the station.

Would like to seek your opinion on such wording.

I will also likely revamp Admiralty map quite soon, unless the station shows any signs of upgrading navigation.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=611437"