Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re "858 DD": new section)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


Hi admin, it's been long since we last talked. Although TEL4 is coming up soon, I would be spending more of my free time upgrading the pages for the other existing MRT Stations.
Hi,  


Before I proceed, I would like to invite admin to look at the 3 examples for Tampines, Eunos and Paya Lebar. I am also aware that I twisted some of the walking distances for the MRT bus stops due to the simplicity of the station layouts, but would like to enquire whether you would still want the standardised 5 min walking distance.
I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.


I look forward to hearing your feedback!
I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.


Thanks and Regards


== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Line 41: Line 42:
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


== Concourse and exit layout WIP ==
== Re "858 DD" ==


Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.
I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.


Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.
AirFan19
 
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards
 
== User : Draconite Dragon ==
 
Hi Admin,
 
I would like to bring your attention to this user : https://sgwiki.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Draconite_Dragon
 
 
On 30 Jun 2023, he claimed that SG6198L and SG6199J has been on 161 for a week on his talk page. As I am a regular passenger of Service 161, I have never seen these 2 buses perform any trips of 161.
 
(Link : https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Trunk_Services_160_-_169&diff=prev&oldid=584281)
 
 
He then removed SG6077C and SG6102M from 161. However, these 2 buses were still being spotted daily.
 
(Link for pictorial proof : https://www.instagram.com/p/Ct9AGtXxp8T/)
 
 
After playing a cat and mouse game of undoing and redoing edits, he suddenly removed the two buses (SG6198L and SG6199J) from 161 and added them into 154, despite "saw it doing 161 for a week or more.". 
 
(Link : https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Trunk_Services_160_-_169&diff=prev&oldid=584379 and https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Trunk_Services_160_-_169&diff=prev&oldid=584379)
 
 
I believe this is not the only standalone case. The user has made many edits and some edits involved shuffling in buses into a service and then removing them a few hours later.
 
(Link : https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Draconite_Dragon&offset=&limit=500&target=Draconite+Dragon)
 
 
I believe his edits are just merely acts of vandalism, and those buses he proclaimed to be on whichever services, do not actually exist.
 
 
Please do take a while to look at his edits, as there are a lot of inconsistencies in his edits, which would cause a lot of reliability issues with the wiki.
 
Regards,
 
Haram
 
== Recent edits==
 
Hi admin,
 
Please kindly take a look at this user edits on service 5, user had placed false info on bus deployments and undoing them will make it hard for other users. There are more new accounts created like this. Thanks
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Trunk_Services_2_-_9&action=history
 
== ItsRaboot ==
 
Hi, <br/>Would like to bring the above user's edits to your attention. They have edited the AWBDR CDGEs into the grey box section in the infobox, even though these units aren't deregistered yet. See https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(CDGE)&curid=7032&oldid=590814 . This is their 3rd time editing this, despite me & another user telling them not to. I would've reverted their edits if not for 3RR.<br/>Thanks,<br/>AirFan19
 
== User Weilong ==
 
Hi could you keep an eye on this user Weilong, his edits look dubious, plus he doesn't edit the relevant pages, not even sure if his edits are correct or not
 
== user:  Draconite Dragon ==
 
pls look into the edit for this user Draconite Dragon
 
all incomplete edit... alway fail to edit former deployment.
and even when he edit former deployment, the dates are all wrong (many are backdate to Jun 2023? or Dec 2023??)
 
seem like his edit are based on single day spotting.  alway have to undo his edit...

Latest revision as of 20:21, 17 May 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.

I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Re "858 DD"[edit]

I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.

AirFan19

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=613732"