Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎TIBS & SMRT Buses Logo: Done. Replaced.)
(→‎Opinion: new section)
Line 55: Line 55:


P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
== Opinion ==
Dear Supernutorcrazy, I am writing this to share with you my ideas on blocking people with bus regos in their username. To me, I think that creating their account with their own unique username is up to the user's decision. Although you are an admin, I do think that the above action done by you is simply not acceptable as more than half of sgWiki's users have bus rego related username. Are you going to block them all? (including those 3 admins?) Do hope that you understand my stand here & no action is required if you still think what you are doing is the correct thing. This is just a penny of my thoughts.
[[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 20:57, 9 May 2018 (+08)

Revision as of 20:57, 9 May 2018

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle

Just some clarifications on the Service 37 page

Hey man,

I read your reply on my talk page. After reading the notice again + your reasons, I do agree with your reasons for taking out his edits (to prevent false info). But so, the main issue is with not stating his legitimate email by appealing while registering his account in time?

Regards, SBS9631X

Alternate Bus Service

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

I am writing this to ask whether I should include Niteowl & NightRider Service into the pages. As these services do not operate during normal train service hours, I think that we should not include them into the pages as it has little or no purpose

Regards, Thefoodie

Kembagan MRT/bs 83059 clarification

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

I would like to clarify on the issue of bus stop 83059(Mjd Kassid), located along Changi Rd. Although it is a far distance away from Kembagan MRT Station, can this be marked as an exemption and be called as an MRT bus stop?

Changi Rd(westbound) and Sims Ave East(eastbound) are one-way roads, in which it will not make sense to only specify the alternate bus services along Sims Ave East, and may put people into confusion in implying that there are no alternate westbound bus services. Furthermore, we put into consideration that Mjd Kassid bus stop is the calling point of MRT shuttle 7 towards Paya Lebar, and the bus stop having the Kembagan station name marked right below the stop name. Therefore, in my opinion, 83059 should be a MRT bus stop.

This issue came to my mind while I am doing a draft on Bedok Reservoir station alternate bus services in my user page.

If this can be possible, will you also mind looking into the following stop on Geylang Rd, on whether this should be an exemption and be considered an MRT bus stop? City Plaza(82019) @Paya Lebar

I wish to clarify in case there may be possible false edits that I may not realise, thus writing this.

I apologize should I have anything that I have wrote inappropriately or by mistake/fault, and I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you.

Google, Internet etc. search for train stations

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Should there be an action taken to change in the station name pages to "MRT Station"/"LRT Station"? This is because when most people search for station names in eg. Google, the leading "MRT"/"LRT" wordings are always directly shown to them to choose the search results they want. Furthermore, the Sgwiki Train Staion pages are not on the first few pages of the search results of "XXX MRT", thus viewership for the Sgwiki train station pages may be low. Additionally, since the bus model pages of Sgwiki made it to their respective search results, I believe we can do the same thing to the train station pages, even though it may be time-consuming to change the page names and waiting for the train station pages to be on the first few search result pages.

Thank you and I look forward to hear your perspective on this issue.

Wekelwrady, 12.44pm, 5 Mar 2018

P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?

Opinion

Dear Supernutorcrazy, I am writing this to share with you my ideas on blocking people with bus regos in their username. To me, I think that creating their account with their own unique username is up to the user's decision. Although you are an admin, I do think that the above action done by you is simply not acceptable as more than half of sgWiki's users have bus rego related username. Are you going to block them all? (including those 3 admins?) Do hope that you understand my stand here & no action is required if you still think what you are doing is the correct thing. This is just a penny of my thoughts.

Hawkeye (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2018 (+08)