User talk:Wekelwrady

Just discuss below.

Reply: Clarification

Hi,

Regarding the Kembangan Station list of bus stop lists, there are missing 3 official bus stop which was not in the list. I had amended it into the list. They are B/S 83059, B/S 83321 and B/S 83329.

Regarding your clarification of B/S 82019, it is not an official bus stop for Paya Lebar.

Thanks & Regards

--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 3 March 2018 21:17 SGT

Reply: Renamining

Hi,

The decision to shift over is for consistency between the naming of pages. It is not for viewership ratings.

Secondly, people will naturally refer to wikipedia and landtransportguru because of the way they represent it. With the new wikipedia format just stated history and facts, and landtransportguru blogging technique, sgWiki will not be the place to refer to.

The main reason why the respective bus model could make it to the respective heading is because of the lack of information and active updating. But the viewership of those are still low and only for bus fan.

With sgWiki Trains 3.0, the objective is to present as many information in a simplified manner. If viewership matters to you more than anything else, please leave sgWiki as wiki is not about viewership.

But, unless necessarily needed, we can create more redirects with the keywords in for such viewership but that not the main area concerns.

copy and paste

hi,

thank you for helping me with those pages and edit errors made by me. would you be fine if i copy and paste from your user page (about the bus interchange / terminal portions).

-VE

Clarification of ban

Good morning admin.

I am not here to appeal for the ban, but I felt I am half-confused and would like to come forward and ask this question for this following rule from Chapter 4 part 8.

VE and I have proven that the templates created are for the purpose of the Planning Areas pages eg.in the edits shown in Sembawang page. Since VE have created Planning Area pages eg.Bukit Merah in recent days and weeks to add in info for the purpose of better knowledge about the Planning Areas, I created these templates to assist him in other Planning Area pages that he would be creating, and this proves that these templates would be for usage for future pages that are in process of being created, neither for just a single page in my user page nor for fun.

Is it still considered a mistake and counted as an offence?

Nevertheless, I respect the ban imposed by the admin and I am not contesting the punishment given, as I might probably misunderstand the situation.