Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3720L"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sharebus: new section) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | == Reply: 161 Deployments == | ||
Hi. | |||
Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it. | |||
I | However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true. | ||
I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services. | |||
I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true. | |||
You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to. | |||
Thanks. | |||
== Sharebus == | |||
Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post | |||
Latest revision as of 12:08, 2 May 2024
Reply: 161 Deployments[edit]
Hi.
Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.
However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.
I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.
I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.
You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.
Thanks.
[edit]
Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post