Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎SMRT AMDEP Services: Sorry was really tired last night while typing this, corrected a point and added a 5th in relation to the 1st.)
(194 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--This section are reserved for unsolved case
== User SBS3107H ==
Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
== User SBS3107H ==
to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
rgds
lemon1974
== User Bus33333 & Tangabriel ==
Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you.
-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


Line 32: Line 12:
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


== Regarding my account  ==
==Leave your message below==
 
Hi Admin,
 
            I feel very puzzled as my account was being blocked when the IP address issue is not my fault. It will be Glad if you could unblock my account. Thank you.
 
Yours faithfully,
 
User SG5064X
 
== User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
Hi,
 
I would like to flag out the disruptive edits done by the above mentioned user.
 
1. Early this year, he claimed that the VSOs faced full retirement.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B10TL_(Volgren)&diff=prev&oldid=468236]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Former_Deployments&diff=prev&oldid=468237]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Short-Trip_Services&diff=prev&oldid=468238]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Tampines_Feeders&diff=prev&oldid=468241]
 
2. He uploaded an inappropriate file using the same file name as the current photo reflected on the [[Volvo B10TL (CDGE)]] page.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=File:SBS9889U_125.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=463067]
 
3. He requested to revert an edit on his behalf when he could have reverted it by himself.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424956]
 
4. He reminded 'SBS9631X' to block an editor when it is up to the administrators to decide.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424973]
 
5. He vandalised with nonsensical/unnecessary information on administrators talk page.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=429510]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464352&oldid=464303]
 
6. He requested the administrators to amend/update ad details based on his spotting/observations, when he could have done them by himself, or patiently waited for other editors to fill in the details.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433891]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433956]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434639]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434640]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=435566]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=448973]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450029]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450202]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=454912]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457070]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457287]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457686]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458382]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458603]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=459068]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=462681]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463300]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463624]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464092&oldid=463838]<br>
 
7. Asked a favour as if 'SBS9631X' owes him a living.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=436671]
 
Please do review the edits.
 
Thank you.
 
== Re: User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
 
Dear Admin
 
I am sorry that I will not do any disruptive editing ever again.<br>
Thank you.
 
Yours faithfully<br>
GoAheadAmbassador
 
==User:Go-Ahead Ambassasor==
 
Hi there,
 
With regards to you un-banning the following user, I guess we could agree to disagree. Because I banned him due to me receiving feedback from several other users, with regards to him adding in details that do not make not much of a difference to the overall listing.
 
Adding in a "Pte Ltd" word is more accurate rep perhaps to the company name, but to me (& many others), if that company name / extra details he edited doesn't appear anywhere at all on the ad (on the bus itself), his edits becomes inconsequential and pointless.
 
However, if his edits are on correcting the actual ad details (which are listed on the bus ad itself), then yes his edits would be a more accurate rep of the ad listing.
 
Hence, even though you and I have a different interpretation on this, nonetheless I will continue to monitor his edits and make sure he does not repeatedly edit pointless stuffs (after pointing out the rationale to him on my earlier ban to his account). He told me he will now edit more responsibly, so we shall KIV and see what happens.
 
Thanks & Regards,
SBS9631X
 
== Locked page for SMRT Services 700-883 ==
 
Hi I've been waiting to edit the updated rostering for the following Services 853 854 855 857 but with the page locked to only allow admins to edit how am I able to help edit to improve the accuracy based on rostering? Just because few kids who have been vandalizing the page? Now it's affecting me already. I got the updated duty numbers for those services which sgwiki has been outdated very badly and I was the one who have been updated those Mandai services. Thanks
 
~ Arthurjie
 
== AMDEP Rostering ==


There has been alot of conflicts of what was reflected in AMDEP's rostering v.s. what is deployed by the starter each day. The way 167 roster put all MAN buses but reality deploys so many more OCs, 980 full fleet OC + 1 Citaro in roster but in reality alot of MAN buses + minority OCs, 854 put OC500LE SD perms but in reality MAN A22/Citaro perms.
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


However it is also impossible to tell readers that AMDEP has many spare buses (like telling people AMDEP has 100-150+ spare buses in the past?!?!?!) because AMDEP practices rotational/random deployments unlike other depots out in KJ/WL/SBST depots. All my edits have followed based on the rostering, so by implementing that warning point it shows your admin team obviously doesn't know my current jobscope & industry I'm working in. Besides, your service pages has many outdated rostered duties both weekdays & especially wekeends, which some services could have received various timetable updates.
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Oh you can also tell SimonLim88 if spotting the fleet is the way to deduce perms every single time, den I also wish how I'm able to figure out the actual deployed perms through how AMDEP deploys their buses.  
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


It is also worth letting ya know 1709 1710 1711 1733 are reflected as 882, 981 perms in roster, which obviously I don't dare to edit knowing AMDEP deploys them on 171 way more frequently.
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


The question now is whether your team want to tell people what the roster reflects each buses are, or you want tell them how each buses are observed as which perm. After all, there should also be ways to explain how do the adverts from each buses come about & a rough gauge which service.


Thanks and no thanks to the warning point. I will defintiely appeal against this warning point and hope this can talk out to your team why I should not deserve that warning point. However if your team insists then I'll step out from all other accurate edits since more contribution = more warning point/editing ban. Thanks
==Station layout==


~ Arthurjie
Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.


===Add on===
Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.  
Hi. Apologies for the late response.


I feel that it would be appropriate to indicate these AMDEP buses similar to GA flexi-deployments. I wanted to implement this since the early days of this practice by AMDEP but I have been suggested to keep them as spare buses to keep them consistent with the other two depots KJDEP & WLDEP. This also caused AMDEP to accumulate many spare buses over the 3+ years.
How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?


I understand that you have been editing according to AMDEP's roster, which I have no objections regarding this as you have been trying to clear out the excess number of spare buses under AMDEP. Likewise, it could have better if the deployments are based on observations but minority of us have the spare time to spot the entire fleet of every single AMDEP services under a daily basis.
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


I will remove your warning point as it is clearly not 'false information' by tallying the scheduled deployments with the actual deployments.
===TEL4 - CCL2===
Hi, some heads up,


Please do update me your thoughts regarding this matter.
I have completed almost all TEL alternative travel methods. If I have the free time, I will update Outram, Maxwell and Marina Bay travel timings (have inserted TEL4 for the aforementioned 3 stations).


Thanks.
In the meantime, some new travel methods have been worked out for CCL2. They are:


== SMRT AMDEP Services ==
Stadium->TE23 Tanjong Rhu + Walking <br>
Mountbatten->TE23 Tanjong Rhu + 11/158 <br>
Dakota->TE24 Katong Park + 30 (unidirectional from TEL4**)


22 March 2020
===TEL4 - EWL===
I have not started work on the EWL end but here are the updated travel methods below


Good evening Sir,
Eunos->TE26 Marine Parade + 55/966 (unidirectional from TEL4**) <br>
Kembangan->TE27 Marine Terrace + 135 <br>
Bedok->TE28 Siglap + 31/196/197 <br>
Tanah Merah->TE29 Bayshore + 14/48 <br>


This matter is in regards to the recent conflicts that happened between me and Arthurjie about Mandai deployments. While I believe the admins should have made it clear on whether Mandai services rely on roster or actual deployments, I do personally feel that it was unfair to give Arthurjie a warning point because he was merely showing another side of the truth, which is the "roster". You can deem the roster as unreliable, but Arthurjie was not wrong to actually show what was in the roster. In fact, if there is anyone to blame, blame it on SMRT for having a roster but not following it. (Basically having a timetable in secondary school but lessons are on a random basis, which makes it completely unreliable.)
I look forward to the new travel times with TEL4 soon!


To prevent any future conflicts, I will go over a handful of solutions that I have thought of to help bring this matter to a close, so that both parties can reach a win win situation. Please do note that this list is non-exhaustive and can be added to suit better needs.
Thanks and Regards


'''1) Making a separate page for Mandai Services only, allocating the actual roster deployments apart from the deployments in reality.'''
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


'''2) Relocate all Mandai allocated buses back to "AMDEP SP"'''
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


'''3) Open a vote to all sgwiki admins / users to decide if Mandai deployments should be based on roster vs reality ( Like an election basically. )'''
== Re "858 DD" ==


'''4) Have a discussion before deeming the bus as a permanent. (For example, SG5879L has been performing on 965 regularly but in the roster it is actually on 857. Keep the bus on hold until SG5879L has been observed appearing a certain amount of times on 965 and then verifying that it no longer appears on 857 on the following day.)'''
I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.


'''5) Open another block to differentiate reality vs roster instead of creating a new page. A new notation can also be introduced to indicate a roster to reality basis. (Eg . SG5879L AMDEP 857///965) Or any other notations deemed fit.'''
AirFan19


I do know that I have no right to make decisions but I feel that point 1 would cater to both the general public as well as the administrative roles. This is because in any case, if the general public is curious on what buses are actually shown on the roster, there is actually a reference for them to look into it and compare it with the actual deployments. While at this, may I also suggest regrouping the SMRT services into AMDEP / WLDEP / KJDEP. This is for easier reference for the public light and also much more easier for the general public to see the actual vs roster. I do hope you will consider my suggestions helpful and do feel free to add a topic into my discussion if you seek any clarifications.
== Editing of TEL4 images ==


Thank you for your patience, understanding and time into reading this.
Hi Supernutorcrazy, I just added images for new TEL4 stations to put in the new stations page, but when I want to add the images in TEL page, turns out a PNG file must be added. Is there any other way to add JPG images or what? Let me know


Regards,  
Thanks,


SimonLim88
[[User:Alphabetlorefan1|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1|talk]]) 24 June 2024, 17:36

Revision as of 17:36, 24 June 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Station layout

Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.

Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.

How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?

Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

TEL4 - CCL2

Hi, some heads up,

I have completed almost all TEL alternative travel methods. If I have the free time, I will update Outram, Maxwell and Marina Bay travel timings (have inserted TEL4 for the aforementioned 3 stations).

In the meantime, some new travel methods have been worked out for CCL2. They are:

Stadium->TE23 Tanjong Rhu + Walking
Mountbatten->TE23 Tanjong Rhu + 11/158
Dakota->TE24 Katong Park + 30 (unidirectional from TEL4**)

TEL4 - EWL

I have not started work on the EWL end but here are the updated travel methods below

Eunos->TE26 Marine Parade + 55/966 (unidirectional from TEL4**)
Kembangan->TE27 Marine Terrace + 135
Bedok->TE28 Siglap + 31/196/197
Tanah Merah->TE29 Bayshore + 14/48

I look forward to the new travel times with TEL4 soon!

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Re "858 DD"

I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.

AirFan19

Editing of TEL4 images

Hi Supernutorcrazy, I just added images for new TEL4 stations to put in the new stations page, but when I want to add the images in TEL page, turns out a PNG file must be added. Is there any other way to add JPG images or what? Let me know

Thanks,

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 24 June 2024, 17:36

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=618903"