Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS8478D"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Searching of past deployment are available through past deployment of bus model. I can assure you it is much faster this way than to manually retrieve past deployment of a single service by going through the 3000+ history for it.
Searching of past deployment are available through past deployment of bus model. I can assure you it is much faster this way than to manually retrieve past deployment of a single service by going through the 3000+ history for it.


==Amend of service to WITH on 14 June==
Hi,


==Re:==
I had noticed you had change the history for some. I would like to explain that all the service that operate from/to Woodlands Integrated Transport Hub (WITH) are amended on 13 June 2021. However, as some service are not in operations on 13 June, but on 14 June, the service was still amended on 13 June. There is also a precedent for such actions taken during the withdrawal of CT28 (1 September 2016 despite the last day of operations in February) and also Circuit Breaker service suspension.
Thanks for your countless valuable inputs. As this issue is between users, it would be appropriate for me to hear the viewpoint on both party to decide the next course of action.


If there is anymore clarification, I will contact you again.
== Updep ==


Thanks and regards
Thanks for the heads up. Cheers.


{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|20 March 2019|20:49}}
==Re: Holiday 1==
Hi.
 
Thanks for correcting me.
 
Is this note correct?
* '''SBS8186X (Express 14e)''' will perform on Service 14 on Weekdays under School Holidays 1 schedule.
 
Thanks.
 
== Re: SBS8810C ==
 
Hi SBS8478D,
 
I understand your concerns about SBS8810C and I fully understand what you mean. However, I believe that CT18 only has 4 perm buses. While SBS8810C does CT18 often as you have said, I am thinking that those are only crossover trips.
 
For example of another case that I have noticed for CT8, SBS6093T performs Services 53 and 53A in the morning, before performing Chinatown Direct CT8 for the whole afternoon. It is then never seen on Service 53 ever again. Despite that, it is still classified as a Service 53 perm bus even though it runs on Chinatown Direct CT8 for more than half the time.
 
So if you apply this scenario inside, it solves the case of Feeder 222's missing bus, still does Short-Trip 222B crossovers, and crossovers on Chinatown Direct CT18 for most of the day. Furthermore, I referred to SBS8810C's deployment records and it has shown to be perming Feeder 222 instead.
 
Hope you understand. Thank you.
Themystery
 
== SG6241U ==
 
Hi,
 
I acknowledged that the user “23ispolo” marked SG6241U as a shared bus. However, he marked it as “HGDEP 51/161”, which means that 51 is the dominant service for this bus. This isn’t true, as the bus has been doing 161 more frequently compared to 51, even appearing on full day duties even for weekends. Hence, the reason why I undid his edits was because I was pretty sure that SG6241U leans more to 161, hence should be “HGDEP 161/51”.
 
Anyways, I’m still new to the sharing bus system, so feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.
 
Thank you.
 
Regards,
Haram
 
==Re: Bus Ad==
Hi,
 
Wikipedia is not a list page for storing information to bus fan community. However, I am inclined to allowed it noticed that most advertisement spans across various fleet, and would generally close an eye if consodilate into a page, for legacy purposes.
 
Regards
 
== Bus Ad update. ==
 
Hi everyone, any bus advertisement updates, feel free to post on my talk page. I'm interested on the latest advertisements on buses.
 
 
==Re: Bus Ad==
It had been created in [[List of Bus Advertisement]]

Latest revision as of 10:45, 28 September 2024

August 2015[edit]

"1.4. When updating de-registered buses, they are to be updated after 2359 hours of the actual de-registration date of the bus. They are not allowed to be updated before the timing as the list will be reverted back if it is updated too early or before the stipulated time. For buses that are awaiting de-registration prior to de-registration, only reflect the status as "Awaiting de-registration" when there's confirmation based on the physical evidence."

Reply[edit]

Searching of past deployment are available through past deployment of bus model. I can assure you it is much faster this way than to manually retrieve past deployment of a single service by going through the 3000+ history for it.

Amend of service to WITH on 14 June[edit]

Hi,

I had noticed you had change the history for some. I would like to explain that all the service that operate from/to Woodlands Integrated Transport Hub (WITH) are amended on 13 June 2021. However, as some service are not in operations on 13 June, but on 14 June, the service was still amended on 13 June. There is also a precedent for such actions taken during the withdrawal of CT28 (1 September 2016 despite the last day of operations in February) and also Circuit Breaker service suspension.

Updep[edit]

Thanks for the heads up. Cheers.

Re: Holiday 1[edit]

Hi.

Thanks for correcting me.

Is this note correct?

  • SBS8186X (Express 14e) will perform on Service 14 on Weekdays under School Holidays 1 schedule.

Thanks.

Re: SBS8810C[edit]

Hi SBS8478D,

I understand your concerns about SBS8810C and I fully understand what you mean. However, I believe that CT18 only has 4 perm buses. While SBS8810C does CT18 often as you have said, I am thinking that those are only crossover trips.

For example of another case that I have noticed for CT8, SBS6093T performs Services 53 and 53A in the morning, before performing Chinatown Direct CT8 for the whole afternoon. It is then never seen on Service 53 ever again. Despite that, it is still classified as a Service 53 perm bus even though it runs on Chinatown Direct CT8 for more than half the time.

So if you apply this scenario inside, it solves the case of Feeder 222's missing bus, still does Short-Trip 222B crossovers, and crossovers on Chinatown Direct CT18 for most of the day. Furthermore, I referred to SBS8810C's deployment records and it has shown to be perming Feeder 222 instead.

Hope you understand. Thank you. Themystery

SG6241U[edit]

Hi,

I acknowledged that the user “23ispolo” marked SG6241U as a shared bus. However, he marked it as “HGDEP 51/161”, which means that 51 is the dominant service for this bus. This isn’t true, as the bus has been doing 161 more frequently compared to 51, even appearing on full day duties even for weekends. Hence, the reason why I undid his edits was because I was pretty sure that SG6241U leans more to 161, hence should be “HGDEP 161/51”.

Anyways, I’m still new to the sharing bus system, so feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.

Thank you.

Regards, Haram

Re: Bus Ad[edit]

Hi,

Wikipedia is not a list page for storing information to bus fan community. However, I am inclined to allowed it noticed that most advertisement spans across various fleet, and would generally close an eye if consodilate into a page, for legacy purposes.

Regards

Bus Ad update.[edit]

Hi everyone, any bus advertisement updates, feel free to post on my talk page. I'm interested on the latest advertisements on buses.


Re: Bus Ad[edit]

It had been created in List of Bus Advertisement