Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎withdrawal: new section)
 
(331 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


== Query ==
==Leave your message below==


hi Supernutorcrazy,
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


just to confirm if sgWiki is going to support lgbt-related articles.. if no, i will consolidate the lgbt articles & related files for you for deletion.
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
 
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
 
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
 
 
==Station layout==
 
Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.
 
Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.  
 
How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?
 
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
 
Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit.


-VE
Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box


== RE: Formatting of Short-Trip Permanent Buses ==
Thanks and Regards


thanks
==Service information ==
The Bus Stop Info can be kind of misleading because of the Show/Hide Route Details. Some readers may think that those are the only bus stops, it wld be btr to use the Click to Expand/Collapse function to prevent this.


themystery
Why not try Show/Hide Full Route Details at least now they know they are seeing only the details partially.


== Requesting Deletion ==
Bring back [[Bus Service 222/222A/222B]] and [[Bus Service 282]] will make the nesscary changes and if u can delete the redirects and move 222/A/B to 222.


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi, how do we do the Green and White (G/W) Services, do they each get a separate page or a combined page
== Bus ads ==
 
Hi, regarding the new format in the pages, where are the ads? The advertisement column isn't there.
 
== Just to bring to your attention, the pages [[Former Deployments of BYD K9]] and [[Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)]] ==
 
Just to bring to your attention that the pages [[Former Deployments of BYD K9]] and [[Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)]] are still around despite these models having been fully retired and all former deployments transferred to the main page.
 
== Bus Service Pages (History) ==
 
I think that including the history pre-integration might complicate things and confuse people. Better to remove them and put them in a separate bus service page, then link those pages I hope it confuses people less.
 
== Since ==
Removed it because it contradicts with the operator and current deployment info. That specific time frames are clearly stated in the former deployment section. Will revert them if you are against this idea.


Requesting for deletion for [[Jurong]] page as there is Jurong East/West pages to serve the purpose. Thank you.
== Re: Bus Ads ==


Wekelwrady
Hi maybe can put it out there any ad updates, can just put on my talk page, because I am interested in the latest bus ad updates. And I do have a personalised mobile bus deployments on my phone then can update there as well.


== Republic of Singapore or Singapore ==
== White/blue UPD sticker ==


Hello Supernutorcrazy,
Hi,  


I would like to request that both Singapore and Republic of Singapore pages to remain. Page Singapore will be a redirect to Page Republic of Singapore (officially & internationally known as this).
The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps.


[[User:Ringo Rango|Ringo Rango]] ([[User talk:Ringo Rango|talk]]) 13:20, 6 November 2018 (+08)
Regards,
Kay


== B5LH page ==
== Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages ==


Hi
Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it.


the new B5LH is being locked by one of the moderator SBS3107 and right now, he edited that the three buses under SBST are under UPDEP.
== Re: reformatting of bus service pages ==


first why this page is locked?
Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks.


second, on what basis that he concluded that all 3 buses are in UPDEP when SG3005E have been spotted parking in AMDEP since registration.
Regards,
if it is a false edit i think as a moderator, he should be banned or remove of the moderator role instead.
LTA Bus Irrationalisation


rgds
== Deletion of those 2 pages or leave it like that ==
lemon1974 12/nov/2018


== USER : Trabis ==
Since those services in those 2 pages are transferred to it's own service page respectively, why I can see to refer it. I have two choices as to delete since it's already transferred or leave it like that? Here are the two pages


Hi
*[[Bedok Feeder Services 222 - 229]]
*[[Toa Payoh Feeder Services 230 - 238]]


can help to look into this user "trabis"
Thanks
he been editing some info on deployment (notice about SV157 fleet, moving some buses from BR to SL), but did not even bother to edit the service 157 parts


dun think his info is correct.. seem like everything he edit relate to SLBP.
[[User:Alphabetlorefan1|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1|talk]]) 5 November 2024, 12:11


rgds
== Bus History page ==
lemon1974 14/11


== No. of Buses. ==
Hi is it possible that History page be kept untouched? I nearly missed out on Sv 78's amendment to Jurong Town Hall Int when doing a complication of the bus history for today (26 November)


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
== Loss of Bus Advertisement Information ==


I will like to raise my objection on including the No. of Buses portion in the tender information on Bus Package pages. My point is that non-Bukit Merah Bus Package buses park at UPDEP. As such, buses may cross over to these services that are not included in the bus package. I don't think that it would be ideal to include this information as it is hard to keep track these information as BOCC are allowed to crossover buses onto various services if needed.
Hi there,
Although it is not significant on the first 3 packages (i.e. Bulim, Loyang and Seletar), it should also be removed to keep the pages as identical as possible.


[[User:Ringo Rango|Ringo Rango]] ([[User talk:Ringo Rango|talk]]) 19:15, 19 November 2018 (+08)
It has been very long since I last spoke to you. A little mixed feelings with regards to the changes but nevertheless would wish to highlight on the removal of the bus advertisement section on bus deployments by model. This makes it harder for bus enthusiasts to track on new bus advertisements and I feel it is a real shame that all the hard work that has been done by previous editors have been put to waste.


== withdrawal ==
Also, in addition to that, I feel the new organisation of information is making the rows and columns unnecessarily long and I do not think this is a good thing from a user perspective point of view (eg. The labeling for Lush Green livery across ~100 buses in rego number succession cannot even be seen easily because so many buses have this livery).


Hi Admin,
With these changes, I also wish to know if Bus Deployments by Service and Bus Deployments by Model will be '''completely''' independent and separate from each other. Because from the way I see it, editors are no longer able to update bus deployments for specific rego numbers into the new Bus Deployments by Service pages. Maybe it would be good if I could get some clarity on the overall changes and  the basis for these drastic changes.


Sources are as such:
Thank you.
658: https://landtransportguru.net/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Dec18_Sv658_Withdraw.jpg
659: https://landtransportguru.net/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Dec18_Sv659_Withdraw.jpg
662: https://landtransportguru.net/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Dec18_Sv662_Withdraw.jpg
664: https://landtransportguru.net/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Dec18_Sv664_Withdraw.jpg


[[User:Ringo Rango|Ringo Rango]] ([[User talk:Ringo Rango|talk]]) 21:05, 1 December 2018 (+08)
Themystery

Latest revision as of 02:38, 30 November 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Station layout[edit]

Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.

Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.

How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?

Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit.

Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box

Thanks and Regards

Service information[edit]

The Bus Stop Info can be kind of misleading because of the Show/Hide Route Details. Some readers may think that those are the only bus stops, it wld be btr to use the Click to Expand/Collapse function to prevent this.

Why not try Show/Hide Full Route Details at least now they know they are seeing only the details partially.

Bring back Bus Service 222/222A/222B and Bus Service 282 will make the nesscary changes and if u can delete the redirects and move 222/A/B to 222.

Hi, how do we do the Green and White (G/W) Services, do they each get a separate page or a combined page

Bus ads[edit]

Hi, regarding the new format in the pages, where are the ads? The advertisement column isn't there.

Just to bring to your attention, the pages Former Deployments of BYD K9 and Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)[edit]

Just to bring to your attention that the pages Former Deployments of BYD K9 and Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE) are still around despite these models having been fully retired and all former deployments transferred to the main page.

Bus Service Pages (History)[edit]

I think that including the history pre-integration might complicate things and confuse people. Better to remove them and put them in a separate bus service page, then link those pages I hope it confuses people less.

Since[edit]

Removed it because it contradicts with the operator and current deployment info. That specific time frames are clearly stated in the former deployment section. Will revert them if you are against this idea.

Re: Bus Ads[edit]

Hi maybe can put it out there any ad updates, can just put on my talk page, because I am interested in the latest bus ad updates. And I do have a personalised mobile bus deployments on my phone then can update there as well.

White/blue UPD sticker[edit]

Hi,

The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps.

Regards, Kay

Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages[edit]

Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it.

Re: reformatting of bus service pages[edit]

Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks.

Regards, LTA Bus Irrationalisation

Deletion of those 2 pages or leave it like that[edit]

Since those services in those 2 pages are transferred to it's own service page respectively, why I can see to refer it. I have two choices as to delete since it's already transferred or leave it like that? Here are the two pages

Thanks

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 5 November 2024, 12:11

Bus History page[edit]

Hi is it possible that History page be kept untouched? I nearly missed out on Sv 78's amendment to Jurong Town Hall Int when doing a complication of the bus history for today (26 November)

Loss of Bus Advertisement Information[edit]

Hi there,

It has been very long since I last spoke to you. A little mixed feelings with regards to the changes but nevertheless would wish to highlight on the removal of the bus advertisement section on bus deployments by model. This makes it harder for bus enthusiasts to track on new bus advertisements and I feel it is a real shame that all the hard work that has been done by previous editors have been put to waste.

Also, in addition to that, I feel the new organisation of information is making the rows and columns unnecessarily long and I do not think this is a good thing from a user perspective point of view (eg. The labeling for Lush Green livery across ~100 buses in rego number succession cannot even be seen easily because so many buses have this livery).

With these changes, I also wish to know if Bus Deployments by Service and Bus Deployments by Model will be completely independent and separate from each other. Because from the way I see it, editors are no longer able to update bus deployments for specific rego numbers into the new Bus Deployments by Service pages. Maybe it would be good if I could get some clarity on the overall changes and the basis for these drastic changes.

Thank you.

Themystery