User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
No edit summary
Haram (talk | contribs)
1,705 edits
→Bus allocation: new section
 
(113 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Regarding Your Ad Changes Edits==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
Dear Mr Lemon,


We admins would appreciate if you do a complete job of making your edits on ad details.
Hi Lemon1974,


And by that, we mean following the existing format and capitalising the words accordingly, even when inputting in new details.
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately


This is in reference to your recent edits of the SDIC ads on buses.
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon


-SBS9631X
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.


==Re: Trabis==
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P
Thanks for the heads up.


==Re:==
Jonathanchu
Thanks for your countless valuable inputs. As this issue is between users, it would be appropriate for me to hear the viewpoint on both party to decide the next course of action.


If there is anymore clarification, I will contact you again.
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.


Thanks and regards
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.


{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|20 March 2019|20:49}}
Thanks!


==Re:new strides /bus plus bus==
== 268B for Evening Peak ==
Hello.


Have created the page on your behalf. PC7991M is currently registered under BYD SG (201409518W).
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


== SEDEP bus edits ==
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Hi Lemon1974
Themystery
 
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==
 
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast
 
== Bus allocation ==
 
Hi,
 
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.
 
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.


It would be sincerely appreciated if you can edit the relevant Former Deployments pages when you edit deployment changes as well. Otherwise, this can cause confusion next time when readers see it. Thank you.
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.  


Themystery
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:30, 10 December 2024

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=641843"