User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
No edit summary
Haram (talk | contribs)
1,705 edits
→Bus allocation: new section
 
(100 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately
 
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon
 
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P


Themystery
Jonathanchu


=== Add on ===
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.
Hi.


Have read your conversation with Themystery.
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.


Previously I have standardised the time periods as provided by Transitlink. Bus stops information panels used to state these under the fare table & LTA's bus route interactive map.
Thanks!


It wouldn't be ideal for us to indicate the exact timings as we do not have much information for most of the interlining/down-route/early trip duties. Even so, timings stated might be outdated over time as the operators may adjust their runtime/schedule.
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


Hence, I will propose the following to replace the current timing periods.
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


* Before 0630: before Weekdays morning peak.
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.
* 0630 to 0830: during Weekdays morning peak.
* 0831 to 1159: during Weekdays morning off-peak.
* 1200 to 1659: during Weekdays afternoon.
* 1700 to 1900: during Weekdays evening peak.
* 1901 to 2059: during Weekdays evening off-peak.
* After 2100: during Weekdays night.


Would it be more appropriate for us to follow the bus lane timings for the morning & evening peak hour periods? 0730 to 0930 & 1700 to 2000.
Themystery


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==
 
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast
 
== Bus allocation ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi,


I would just like to notify you about some possible deployment changes and maybe you can help keep a look out.
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.  


SBS2002H 162 >> 138 (on 138 daily for the past weeks)<br>
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.
SBS6827T 162 >> 138/SP (on 138 quite often as well and sometimes other AMK Int services)<br>
SG1172T 162 >> 24 (seen on 24 on an AP duty very often as well)<br>
SG1162Y SP >> 265 (seen on 265 split shifts often)<br>
SBS6064C 138 >> 268 (seen on 268 quite a few times, and E6 A22s on 6064C’s 138 perm duty)<br>
SBS6582Z/SBS6578L/SBS6889P/SBS6589E >> 265 (these buses keep appearing on duty 4A 11P, not sure if there’s a specific pattern or it’s just random deployments)


Sorry for disturbing but just notifying you and hopefully more changes can be identified and confirmed. Thank you!
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.  


Jonathanchu
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:30, 10 December 2024

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=641843"