User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,586 edits
Haram (talk | contribs)
1,705 edits
→Bus allocation: new section
 
(67 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Walch Centralin ==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
 
Hi Lemon1974,
 
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately


Hi Lemon,
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon


Regarding your query on the Walch ads, there are buses both with the 2/3 version, and also buses with the version that's only Partial sides.  
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.


Those with the 2/3 version also have the products flipped on the nearside and offside, as compared to those with Partial sides.  
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P


Do compare and note the difference for the ad details listed on Wiki for both versions, thanks.
Jonathanchu
(for reference, SG5055Y SG5056U has the Partial sides version, but SG5103S has the 2/3 version instead)


As such, whatever you saw that has Walch listed but yet do not have the PS & B labels = those are the ones with the full 2/3 version.  
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.


Those with the PS & B stated are those with the Partial Sides verisons.
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.


So in a nutshell, there's both 2/3 and Partial sides versions for this ad.
Thanks!


Hope this answers and clarifies your confusion thus far.
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


Regards,  
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,
SBS9631X


== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Hi Lemon1974,
Themystery


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Hope this helps. Thank you.
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


Themystery
== Bus allocation ==


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
Hi,


Hi Lemon1974,
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.


Yes I don’t think the 268 weekday duties are reflected correctly, there should be more than 6AP, I saw a 268 citaro cameo 1023R with the duty sheet reflecting duty 13P.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


I also think I saw a duty 25S for 265 so I’m not sure if the E duty is duty 25E. 265’s E duty starts quite early, one of the first few buses (after duty 3A)
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.


Jonathanchu
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:30, 10 December 2024

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=641843"