User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,586 edits
Haram (talk | contribs)
1,705 edits
→Bus allocation: new section
 
(58 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately
 
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon
 
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.
 
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P
 
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.
 
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
 
Thanks!
 
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


Hope this helps. Thank you.
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,
 
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Themystery
Themystery


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Hi Lemon1974,
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


I’m not too sure about 1234Z for now, but I noticed it doing 265 consistently for two weeks last December, and the same bc was driving 1234Z each week, indicating that it was the same duty, so I listed it as perm and I suspect it’s duty 24S. I haven’t seen it around lately on 265 or 135.
== Bus allocation ==


Also got to watch 6585R and 2004C, they are running around a lot these days. 5162J is back to doing the usual duty which departs AMK Int after the 0647 downroute in the morning, which is 22S. However, I don’t see 2004C doing 21S, it is always very random.
Hi,


As for 1239K, I have also noticed it doing 162 everyday after it got the ad. But I realised that it has been on electric bus slots, with block numbers starting with 5 (e.g. 162-se-514 on Monday 11 Jan and 162-se-504 on Tuesday 12 Jan). Probably just there replacing the K9s, but can KIV as it might become a perm. I suspect it will regularly do 162 but not perm a specific slot, like SG1157M in the past.
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.  


A lot of 162 K9s are missing, I have not seen 3057E 3065G 3067B for quite some time. 135 K9s seem to be doing fine though.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


Thank you!
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.


Jonathanchu
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:30, 10 December 2024

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=641843"