Difference between revisions of "User talk:Al92"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Please read the notice on every page. | Please read the notice on every page. | ||
It would be appreciated if you do not post unverified transfers, all inter-company transfers ownership have to be checked on One Motoring before editing. This has yet to be reflected on OM, hence your edits have been undone. If you do not know how to use it, leave it to others to edit. This is not the first time you have done so, as you done it during the Tower handover. Furthermore certain buses in your list are still with SBS. | It would be appreciated if you do not post unverified transfers, all inter-company transfers ownership have to be checked on One Motoring before editing. This has yet to be reflected on OM as of 11:30pm 4/9/16, hence your edits have been undone. If you do not know how to use it, leave it to others to edit. This is not the first time you have done so, as you done it during the Tower handover. Furthermore certain buses in your list are still with SBS. | ||
--Scania 00:44, 5 September 2016 (SGT) | --Scania 00:44, 5 September 2016 (SGT) | ||
==Opinion== | |||
Hi, | |||
I would like to seek your opinion on the following proposed changes: | |||
1. Launch of sgWiki Bus Spotting Page | |||
A new page will be created daily and automatically deleted a month later. For example, "Bus Spotting/1 February 2025" would be removed on 1 March 2025. This page is intended to allow editors to document bus registration numbers without the typical edit limitations, enabling infinite edits. | |||
The primary objective is to encourage collaboration among editors and to improve the accuracy of bus deployment data in relation to their permanent services. Many users have noted that the deployment page contains inaccurate and outdated information. By using these pages, we aim to track bus operations more effectively and allocate the correct permanent services, without requiring editors to board the buses to verify duty schedules. | |||
2. Use of Subpages for Bus Model Deployment | |||
I have received considerable feedback, mostly criticism, regarding the separation and consolidation of bus advertisements across models. Most complaints focus on advertisement changes rather than deployment accuracy, which contributes to the aforementioned inaccuracies. As such, I propose reorganising the Bus Model deployment using subpages as follows: | |||
Example: Volvo B9TL (WEG Batch 2) will be divided into four subpages: | |||
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 1 – (Low Entry, SBS7700T – SBS7729L) | |||
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 2 – (Low Floor, SBS3000G – SBS3099Y) | |||
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 3 – (Low Floor, SBS3100B – SBS3199S) | |||
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 4 – (Low Floor, SBS3200X – SBS3238M & SBS3269Z) | |||
A navigation bar will be added at the top and bottom of each page, linking the respective subpages. Each page will feature a single table listing up to 100 buses, organised in the following format: | |||
Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment | |||
This approach seeks to balance different perspectives, and to be more mobile friendly, as I am uncertain why some users are strongly opposed to these changes. | |||
Alternative Table Layouts: | |||
# Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Maintain status quo) | |||
# Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order, maintain status quo) | |||
# Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order) | |||
Please let me know your thoughts on these proposals. Thank you for your time and feedback. | |||
Regards, Supernutorcrazy |
Latest revision as of 15:58, 18 January 2025
Do not post unverified transfers.[edit]
Dear al92,
Please read the notice on every page.
It would be appreciated if you do not post unverified transfers, all inter-company transfers ownership have to be checked on One Motoring before editing. This has yet to be reflected on OM as of 11:30pm 4/9/16, hence your edits have been undone. If you do not know how to use it, leave it to others to edit. This is not the first time you have done so, as you done it during the Tower handover. Furthermore certain buses in your list are still with SBS.
--Scania 00:44, 5 September 2016 (SGT)
Opinion[edit]
Hi,
I would like to seek your opinion on the following proposed changes:
1. Launch of sgWiki Bus Spotting Page A new page will be created daily and automatically deleted a month later. For example, "Bus Spotting/1 February 2025" would be removed on 1 March 2025. This page is intended to allow editors to document bus registration numbers without the typical edit limitations, enabling infinite edits.
The primary objective is to encourage collaboration among editors and to improve the accuracy of bus deployment data in relation to their permanent services. Many users have noted that the deployment page contains inaccurate and outdated information. By using these pages, we aim to track bus operations more effectively and allocate the correct permanent services, without requiring editors to board the buses to verify duty schedules.
2. Use of Subpages for Bus Model Deployment I have received considerable feedback, mostly criticism, regarding the separation and consolidation of bus advertisements across models. Most complaints focus on advertisement changes rather than deployment accuracy, which contributes to the aforementioned inaccuracies. As such, I propose reorganising the Bus Model deployment using subpages as follows:
Example: Volvo B9TL (WEG Batch 2) will be divided into four subpages:
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 1 – (Low Entry, SBS7700T – SBS7729L)
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 2 – (Low Floor, SBS3000G – SBS3099Y)
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 3 – (Low Floor, SBS3100B – SBS3199S)
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 4 – (Low Floor, SBS3200X – SBS3238M & SBS3269Z)
A navigation bar will be added at the top and bottom of each page, linking the respective subpages. Each page will feature a single table listing up to 100 buses, organised in the following format:
Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment
This approach seeks to balance different perspectives, and to be more mobile friendly, as I am uncertain why some users are strongly opposed to these changes.
Alternative Table Layouts:
- Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Maintain status quo)
- Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order, maintain status quo)
- Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order)
Please let me know your thoughts on these proposals. Thank you for your time and feedback.
Regards, Supernutorcrazy