Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3720L"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Sharebus: new section)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Service 27==
== Reply: 161 Deployments ==
Hi.


Hi,
Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.
I saw your edits on Sv 27, and I would like to find out which are the confirmed perms for Sv 27 + which are the ones that are stuck on Sv 27 since Monday.  


Because for certain buses like 6076T, 6813H etc, when you put them into Sv 27's page like this, you're messing up all the other pages as well - Especially if some of them are only temporary measures by HG to cover their asses for the lack of Citaros available.  
However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.


So i would like a clarification on which are the confirmed perms & which are the ones on the 'Suspected' list.  
I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.


I assume we're all editing for the benefit of the community, so I'm asking this mainly to settle the other pages. Thanks.
I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.


Regards,
You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.
SBS9631X
-------------------------------
 
Hi SBS3720L,
 
The purpose of moving the A95 pages into different batches is to reduce/better editing with fewer buses.
 
I had also taken into consideration of how pages links, and relink most pages accordingly, to the point that one could easily find the new link at [[Bus Deployments]].
 
With that in place, I had already ensured that it can be traced and guided to unless you are using other linkage that you are using.
 
If you are refering to revision history, please note that excessive history will be cleared regularly.
 
Please take not that you are liable for a ban due to '''Creating unneccessary/redundant page'''. Please feel free to use my talk page for any clarification.
 
Thanks&Regards
 
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|21 Sept 2017|0639}}
 
==September 2017==
Hi SBS3720L,
 
The recent edits you have made today has some matters that I need to take concern which is not updating the Buses in depots section of Scania K230UB (Batch 2 Euro IV) and Former Deployments of Scania K230UB (Batch 2 Euro IV). Please remind yourself in the future to do so.


Thanks.
Thanks.


[[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]</sup> 18:15, 25 September 2017 (+08)
== Sharebus ==
 
Hi SBS3107H, i totally forgot about that while editing. Its been a busy day today due to the mass re-deployment of buses between hougang and amk(25 sep 2017). For some i didnt edit because it was subjected to be confirmed as first day cant seem to confirm everything. But for confirmed ones, that slipped out of my mind.
(New to the talk feature so idk how to use it.)
 
==Google Search Result==
Hi,
 
Now with the clarification, I understand your feeling when Google Search went completely out. You may wish to feedback to Google directly. However, as with page transfering/distribution, some link from Google will remain broke till up to 1 months as the Bot from Google need to crawl and collect the correct link information and data.
 
This is beyond our point of control. Please channel your feedback to Google directly.
 
Thanks&Regards


{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|26 September 2017|0632}}
Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post

Latest revision as of 12:08, 2 May 2024

Reply: 161 Deployments[edit]

Hi.

Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.

However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.

I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.

I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.

You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.

Thanks.

Sharebus[edit]

Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3720L&oldid=611774"