|
|
(249 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL--> | | <!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL--> |
| <!--This section are reserved for unsolved case
| |
|
| |
| == User SBS3107H ==
| |
|
| |
| Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
| |
|
| |
| == User SBS3107H ==
| |
|
| |
| to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
| |
|
| |
| EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
| |
|
| |
| rgds
| |
| lemon1974
| |
|
| |
| == User Bus33333 & Tangabriel ==
| |
|
| |
| Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you.
| |
| -->
| |
|
| |
| Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me. | | Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me. |
|
| |
|
Line 32: |
Line 12: |
| **Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle''' | | **Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle''' |
| *Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it. | | *Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it. |
| | *I will not entertain any request under BCM transition. |
|
| |
|
| == Regarding my account == | | ==Leave your message below== |
| | |
| Hi Admin,
| |
| | |
| I feel very puzzled as my account was being blocked when the IP address issue is not my fault. It will be Glad if you could unblock my account. Thank you.
| |
| | |
| Yours faithfully,
| |
| | |
| User SG5064X
| |
| | |
| == User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
| |
| Hi,
| |
| | |
| I would like to flag out the disruptive edits done by the above mentioned user.
| |
| | |
| 1. Early this year, he claimed that the VSOs faced full retirement.
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B10TL_(Volgren)&diff=prev&oldid=468236]
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Former_Deployments&diff=prev&oldid=468237]
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Short-Trip_Services&diff=prev&oldid=468238]
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Tampines_Feeders&diff=prev&oldid=468241]
| |
| | |
| 2. He uploaded an inappropriate file using the same file name as the current photo reflected on the [[Volvo B10TL (CDGE)]] page.
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=File:SBS9889U_125.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=463067]
| |
| | |
| 3. He requested to revert an edit on his behalf when he could have reverted it by himself.
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424956]
| |
| | |
| 4. He reminded 'SBS9631X' to block an editor when it is up to the administrators to decide.<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424973]
| |
| | |
| 5. He vandalised with nonsensical/unnecessary information on administrators talk page.<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=429510]
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464352&oldid=464303]
| |
| | |
| 6. He requested the administrators to amend/update ad details based on his spotting/observations, when he could have done them by himself, or patiently waited for other editors to fill in the details.<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433891]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433956]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434639]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434640]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=435566]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=448973]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450029]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450202]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=454912]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457070]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457287]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457686]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458382]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458603]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=459068]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=462681]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463300]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463624]<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464092&oldid=463838]<br>
| |
| | |
| 7. Asked a favour as if 'SBS9631X' owes him a living.<br>
| |
| * [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=436671]
| |
| | |
| Please do review the edits.
| |
| | |
| Thank you.
| |
| | |
| == Re: User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
| |
| | |
| Dear Admin
| |
|
| |
|
| I am sorry that I will not do any disruptive editing ever again.<br>
| | ===Rail Wiki Expansion=== |
| Thank you.
| |
|
| |
|
| Yours faithfully<br>
| | Hi Supernutorcrazy, |
| GoAheadAmbassador
| |
|
| |
|
| ==User:Go-Ahead Ambassasor==
| | Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br> |
| | Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br> |
| | All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts. |
|
| |
|
| Hi there,
| | I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you. |
|
| |
|
| With regards to you un-banning the following user, I guess we could agree to disagree. Because I banned him due to me receiving feedback from several other users, with regards to him adding in details that do not make not much of a difference to the overall listing.
| |
|
| |
|
| Adding in a "Pte Ltd" word is more accurate rep perhaps to the company name, but to me (& many others), if that company name / extra details he edited doesn't appear anywhere at all on the ad (on the bus itself), his edits becomes inconsequential and pointless.
| | ==Station layout== |
|
| |
|
| However, if his edits are on correcting the actual ad details (which are listed on the bus ad itself), then yes his edits would be a more accurate rep of the ad listing.
| | Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place. |
|
| |
|
| Hence, even though you and I have a different interpretation on this, nonetheless I will continue to monitor his edits and make sure he does not repeatedly edit pointless stuffs (after pointing out the rationale to him on my earlier ban to his account). He told me he will now edit more responsibly, so we shall KIV and see what happens.
| | Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication. |
|
| |
|
| Thanks & Regards,
| | How would this turn out if it were a transfer station? |
| SBS9631X
| |
|
| |
|
| == Locked page for SMRT Services 700-883 == | | == Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades== |
|
| |
|
| Hi I've been waiting to edit the updated rostering for the following Services 853 854 855 857 but with the page locked to only allow admins to edit how am I able to help edit to improve the accuracy based on rostering? Just because few kids who have been vandalizing the page? Now it's affecting me already. I got the updated duty numbers for those services which sgwiki has been outdated very badly and I was the one who have been updated those Mandai services. Thanks
| | Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit. |
|
| |
|
| ~ Arthurjie
| | Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box |
|
| |
|
| == AMDEP Rostering ==
| | Thanks and Regards |
|
| |
|
| There has been alot of conflicts of what was reflected in AMDEP's rostering v.s. what is deployed by the starter each day. The way 167 roster put all MAN buses but reality deploys so many more OCs, 980 full fleet OC + 1 Citaro in roster but in reality alot of MAN buses + minority OCs, 854 put OC500LE SD perms but in reality MAN A22/Citaro perms.
| | ==Service information == |
| | The Bus Stop Info can be kind of misleading because of the Show/Hide Route Details. Some readers may think that those are the only bus stops, it wld be btr to use the Click to Expand/Collapse function to prevent this. |
|
| |
|
| However it is also impossible to tell readers that AMDEP has many spare buses (like telling people AMDEP has 100-150+ spare buses in the past?!?!?!) because AMDEP practices rotational/random deployments unlike other depots out in KJ/WL/SBST depots. All my edits have followed based on the rostering, so by implementing that warning point it shows your admin team obviously doesn't know my current jobscope & industry I'm working in. Besides, your service pages has many outdated rostered duties both weekdays & especially wekeends, which some services could have received various timetable updates.
| | Why not try Show/Hide Full Route Details at least now they know they are seeing only the details partially. |
|
| |
|
| Oh you can also tell SimonLim88 if spotting the fleet is the way to deduce perms every single time, den I also wish how I'm able to figure out the actual deployed perms through how AMDEP deploys their buses.
| | Bring back [[Bus Service 222/222A/222B]] and [[Bus Service 282]] will make the nesscary changes and if u can delete the redirects and move 222/A/B to 222. |
|
| |
|
| It is also worth letting ya know 1709 1710 1711 1733 are reflected as 882, 981 perms in roster, which obviously I don't dare to edit knowing AMDEP deploys them on 171 way more frequently.
| | Hi, how do we do the Green and White (G/W) Services, do they each get a separate page or a combined page |
| | == Bus ads == |
|
| |
|
| The question now is whether your team want to tell people what the roster reflects each buses are, or you want tell them how each buses are observed as which perm. After all, there should also be ways to explain how do the adverts from each buses come about & a rough gauge which service.
| | Hi, regarding the new format in the pages, where are the ads? The advertisement column isn't there. |
|
| |
|
| Thanks and no thanks to the warning point. I will defintiely appeal against this warning point and hope this can talk out to your team why I should not deserve that warning point. However if your team insists then I'll step out from all other accurate edits since more contribution = more warning point/editing ban. Thanks
| | == Just to bring to your attention, the pages [[Former Deployments of BYD K9]] and [[Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)]] == |
|
| |
|
| ~ Arthurjie
| | Just to bring to your attention that the pages [[Former Deployments of BYD K9]] and [[Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)]] are still around despite these models having been fully retired and all former deployments transferred to the main page. |
|
| |
|
| ===Add on=== | | == Bus Service Pages (History) == |
| Hi. Apologies for the late response.
| |
|
| |
|
| I feel that it would be appropriate to indicate these AMDEP buses similar to GA flexi-deployments. I wanted to implement this since the early days of this practice by AMDEP but I have been suggested to keep them as spare buses to keep them consistent with the other two depots KJDEP & WLDEP. This also caused AMDEP to accumulate many spare buses over the 3+ years. | | I think that including the history pre-integration might complicate things and confuse people. Better to remove them and put them in a separate bus service page, then link those pages I hope it confuses people less. |
|
| |
|
| I understand that you have been editing according to AMDEP's roster, which I have no objections regarding this as you have been trying to clear out the excess number of spare buses under AMDEP. Likewise, it could have better if the deployments are based on observations but minority of us have the spare time to spot the entire fleet of every single AMDEP services under a daily basis.
| | == Since == |
| | Removed it because it contradicts with the operator and current deployment info. That specific time frames are clearly stated in the former deployment section. Will revert them if you are against this idea. |
|
| |
|
| I will remove your warning point as it is clearly not 'false information' by tallying the scheduled deployments with the actual deployments.
| | == Re: Bus Ads == |
|
| |
|
| Please do update me your thoughts regarding this matter.
| | Hi maybe can put it out there any ad updates, can just put on my talk page, because I am interested in the latest bus ad updates. And I do have a personalised mobile bus deployments on my phone then can update there as well. |
|
| |
|
| Thanks.
| | == White/blue UPD sticker == |
|
| |
|
| == SMRT AMDEP Services ==
| | Hi, |
|
| |
|
| 22 March 2020
| | The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps. |
|
| |
|
| Good evening Sir,
| | Regards, |
| | Kay |
|
| |
|
| This matter is in regards to the recent conflicts that happened between me and Arthurjie about Mandai deployments. While I believe the admins should have made it clear on whether Mandai services rely on roster or actual deployments, I do personally feel that it was unfair to give Arthurjie a warning point because he was merely showing another side of the truth, which is the "roster". You can deem the roster as unreliable, but Arthurjie was not wrong to actually show what was in the roster. In fact, if there is anyone to blame, blame it on SMRT for having a roster but not following it. (Basically having a timetable in secondary school but lessons are on a random basis, which makes it completely unreliable.)
| | == Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages == |
|
| |
|
| To prevent any future conflicts, I will go over a handful of solutions that I have thought of to help bring this matter to a close, so that both parties can reach a win win situation. Please do note that this list is non-exhaustive and can be added to suit better needs.
| | Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it. |
|
| |
|
| '''1) Making a separate page for Mandai Services only, allocating the actual roster deployments apart from the deployments in reality.'''
| | == Re: reformatting of bus service pages == |
|
| |
|
| '''2) Relocate all Mandai allocated buses back to "AMDEP SP"'''
| | Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks. |
|
| |
|
| '''3) Open a vote to all sgwiki admins / users to decide if Mandai deployments should be based on AMDEP( Like an election basically. )'''
| | Regards, |
| | LTA Bus Irrationalisation |
|
| |
|
| '''4) Have a discussion before deeming the bus as a permanent. (For example, SG5879L has been performing on 965 regularly but in the roster it is actually on 857. Keep the bus on hold until SG5879L has been observed appearing a certain amount of times on 965 and then verifying that it no longer appears on 857 on the following day.)'''
| | == Deletion of those 2 pages or leave it like that == |
|
| |
|
| I do know that I have no right to make decisions but I feel that point 1 would cater to both the general public as well as the administrative roles. This is because in any case, if the general public is curious on what buses are actually shown on the roster, there is actually a reference for them to look into it and compare it with the actual deployments. While at this, may I also suggest regrouping the SMRT services into AMDEP / WLDEP / KJDEP. This is for easier reference for the public light and also much more easier for the general public to see the actual vs roster. I do hope you will consider my suggestions helpful and do feel free to add a topic into my discussion if you seek any clarifications.
| | Since those services in those 2 pages are transferred to it's own service page respectively, why I can see to refer it. I have two choices as to delete since it's already transferred or leave it like that? Here are the two pages |
|
| |
|
| Thank you for your patience, understanding and time into reading this.
| | *[[Bedok Feeder Services 222 - 229]] |
| | *[[Toa Payoh Feeder Services 230 - 238]] |
|
| |
|
| Regards,
| | Thanks |
|
| |
|
| SimonLim88
| | [[User:Alphabetlorefan1|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1|talk]]) 5 November 2024, 12:11 |
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
- Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
- Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
- Please do not ask for permission to do something.
- Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
- When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
- Affected sections code
- Advertisement in full
- Affected parts to change in details.
- Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
- Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
- I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.
Leave your message below[edit]
Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
Station layout[edit]
Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.
Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.
How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?
Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]
Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit.
Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box
Thanks and Regards
Service information[edit]
The Bus Stop Info can be kind of misleading because of the Show/Hide Route Details. Some readers may think that those are the only bus stops, it wld be btr to use the Click to Expand/Collapse function to prevent this.
Why not try Show/Hide Full Route Details at least now they know they are seeing only the details partially.
Bring back Bus Service 222/222A/222B and Bus Service 282 will make the nesscary changes and if u can delete the redirects and move 222/A/B to 222.
Hi, how do we do the Green and White (G/W) Services, do they each get a separate page or a combined page
Bus ads[edit]
Hi, regarding the new format in the pages, where are the ads? The advertisement column isn't there.
Just to bring to your attention that the pages Former Deployments of BYD K9 and Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE) are still around despite these models having been fully retired and all former deployments transferred to the main page.
Bus Service Pages (History)[edit]
I think that including the history pre-integration might complicate things and confuse people. Better to remove them and put them in a separate bus service page, then link those pages I hope it confuses people less.
Removed it because it contradicts with the operator and current deployment info. That specific time frames are clearly stated in the former deployment section. Will revert them if you are against this idea.
Re: Bus Ads[edit]
Hi maybe can put it out there any ad updates, can just put on my talk page, because I am interested in the latest bus ad updates. And I do have a personalised mobile bus deployments on my phone then can update there as well.
White/blue UPD sticker[edit]
Hi,
The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kay
Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages[edit]
Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it.
Re: reformatting of bus service pages[edit]
Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks.
Regards,
LTA Bus Irrationalisation
Deletion of those 2 pages or leave it like that[edit]
Since those services in those 2 pages are transferred to it's own service page respectively, why I can see to refer it. I have two choices as to delete since it's already transferred or leave it like that? Here are the two pages
Thanks
Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 5 November 2024, 12:11