User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,586 edits
Haram (talk | contribs)
1,705 edits
→Bus allocation: new section
 
(97 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately
 
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon
 
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.
 
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P
 
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.


Themystery
Thanks!


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


I would just like to notify you about some possible deployment changes and maybe you can help keep a look out.
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


SBS2002H 162 >> 138 (on 138 daily for the past weeks)<br>
Themystery
SBS6827T 162 >> 138/SP (on 138 quite often as well and sometimes other AMK Int services)<br>
SG1172T 162 >> 24 (seen on 24 on an AP duty very often as well)<br>
SG1162Y SP >> 265 (seen on 265 split shifts often)<br>
SBS6064C 138 >> 268 (seen on 268 quite a few times, and E6 A22s on 6064C’s 138 perm duty)<br>
SBS6582Z/SBS6578L/SBS6889P/SBS6589E >> 265 (these buses keep appearing on duty 4A 11P, not sure if there’s a specific pattern or it’s just random deployments)


Sorry for disturbing but just notifying you and hopefully more changes can be identified and confirmed. Thank you!
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Jonathanchu
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


Also, may I know where to check on the coinbox for perm stickers? I have not seen a single sticker on SEDEP bus coinboxes...
== Bus allocation ==


Ohh I don’t stay at ave 5 but I go around st50+ almost everyday. I stay at another part of amk hehe
Hi,


== Re: off peak/peak ==
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.  
Hi.


It will be best if we can input the timings for the short-trips & down-routes.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


I guess we should follow the timings for OPP. However these peak hour timings should also apply for weekends & PHs instead of indicating them as off-peak for the entire day.
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.  


Thanks.
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:30, 10 December 2024

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=641843"