User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,586 edits
Haram (talk | contribs)
1,705 edits
→Bus allocation: new section
 
(68 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Walch Centralin ==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
 
Hi Lemon1974,
 
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately


Hi Lemon,
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon


Regarding your query on the Walch ads, there are buses both with the 2/3 version, and also buses with the version that's only Partial sides.  
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.


Those with the 2/3 version also have the products flipped on the nearside and offside, as compared to those with Partial sides.  
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P
 
Jonathanchu


Do compare and note the difference for the ad details listed on Wiki for both versions, thanks.  
==User: Bus74742==
(for reference, SG5055Y SG5056U has the Partial sides version, but SG5103S has the 2/3 version instead)
Hi.


As such, whatever you saw that has Walch listed but yet do not have the PS & B labels = those are the ones with the full 2/3 version.  
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.


Those with the PS & B stated are those with the Partial Sides verisons.
Thanks!


So in a nutshell, there's both 2/3 and Partial sides versions for this ad.
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


Hope this answers and clarifies your confusion thus far.
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


Regards,
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.
SBS9631X


== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
Themystery


Hi Lemon1974,
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


Hope this helps. Thank you.
== Bus allocation ==


Themystery
Hi,


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.


Hi Lemon1974,
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.


Yes, I’ve noticed that 6063E has the 162 perm sticker, but I don’t think it perms 162. Ever since it was doing 135 and running around on 265 268 76, the 162 perm sticker was still there, probably back from when it used to perm 162, a year or two ago. But now I don’t think it perms 162
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.  


Also, could you help me keep a lookout for SBS6568R? I have noticed that it has some extra cameras at the sides of the back of the bus which other citaros do not have. They do not look like the ones 6650K used to have so it could be a new trial or something. The cameras might be the ones on the euro 6 buses, BYD K9 etc so please help me lookout, thank you!!
Hope it clarifies.
Jonathanchu

Latest revision as of 20:30, 10 December 2024

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=641843"