User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,682 edits
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,682 edits
 
(71 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Walch Centralin ==
== SG1085L ==


Hi Lemon,
Hi Lemon1974,


Regarding your query on the Walch ads, there are buses both with the 2/3 version, and also buses with the version that's only Partial sides.  
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


Those with the 2/3 version also have the products flipped on the nearside and offside, as compared to those with Partial sides.  
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.


Do compare and note the difference for the ad details listed on Wiki for both versions, thanks.  
27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.
(for reference, SG5055Y SG5056U has the Partial sides version, but SG5103S has the 2/3 version instead)


As such, whatever you saw that has Walch listed but yet do not have the PS & B labels = those are the ones with the full 2/3 version.  
29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.


Those with the PS & B stated are those with the Partial Sides verisons.
6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261


So in a nutshell, there's both 2/3 and Partial sides versions for this ad.
Jonathanchu


Hope this answers and clarifies your confusion thus far.  
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.


Regards,
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
SBS9631X


== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
Thanks!


Hi Lemon1974,
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


Hope this helps. Thank you.
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Themystery
Themystery


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==
 
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast
 
== Bus allocation ==
 
Hi,


Hi Lemon1974,
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.


Yes I don’t think the 268 weekday duties are reflected correctly, there should be more than 6AP, I saw a 268 citaro cameo 1023R with the duty sheet reflecting duty 13P.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


I also think I saw a duty 25S for 265 so I’m not sure if the E duty is duty 25E. 265’s E duty starts quite early, one of the first few buses (after duty 3A)
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.


Jonathanchu
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.

29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.

6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=728119"