User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,682 edits
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,682 edits
 
(60 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SG1085L ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.
 
27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.
 
29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.
 
6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261
 
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.
 
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
 
Thanks!
 
== 268B for Evening Peak ==
 
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,
 
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Themystery
Themystery


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Hi Lemon1974,
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast
 
== Bus allocation ==


I removed 6585R and 1234Z as 265 perms. Although 2004C runs around quite a bit, it still sticks to the 0647 downroute duty whenever it’s on 265. 6585R is always doing random duties if it’s on 265, but nowadays it’s hardly on 265, keep seeing it on 162 and 24. 1234Z was probably filling in for missing buses at that time, no longer regularly does the same 265 duty.
Hi,


Still not too sure about 5232R, I’ve never really seen it on 268. I’m a little unsure about 265 duty 24S as the bus after 23S in the morning is always 15S, the first bus on its second trip. If 5232R keeps doing split shifts and departs later it could be perm duty 24S.
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.  


1814A has been filling in for duty 4A/11P recently, which is the duty 8279L (transferred to BNDEP) used to perm. Not sure if 1814A is a 265 perm now or just filling in the missing slot. 5232R usually fills in for such missing slots but this time that’s not the case.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


Thank you!
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.


Jonathanchu
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.

29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.

6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=728119"