User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SG1085L ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.


Themystery
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.
 
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
 
Thanks!
 
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


Hi Lemon1974,
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Yes, during AM peak, the turn from AMK Ave 5 to AMK St 53 is always very very jammed, can take 5-10 minutes for 265 just to make that turn on normal days. The rain made it really bad today, heard some buses took more than 30 minutes to make this turn, causing the mad bunching.
Themystery


I’ve noticed 1172T running around lately, but not too sure about 1088D 6810R. I’ll help to keep a lookout.
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Also, have you seen SBS5102H lately? 8279L has been doing its 265 duty (25E 265-se-418) for the past week or so, together with SMB3099G always doing duty 18S 265-se-411
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


Thanks!!
== Bus allocation ==


Jonathanchu
Hi,


Hi Lemon1974 & Jonathanchu,
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.


Talking about the redeployment of 6882H, I remember boarding 6882H on 668, 1 or 2 month ago. I dunno whether it is just a random cameo or it is a x-over of 24/668 or 24/130/668.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


Thank You
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.


SBS 3600 A
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 09:45, 10 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.