User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,655 edits
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,655 edits
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SG1085L ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.


Themystery
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.
 
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
 
Thanks!
 
== 268B for Evening Peak ==
 
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Hi Lemon1974,
Themystery


Not too sure about 6587K 1098B now, haven’t seen them for some time.
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


I think svc 76 might have a duty change, I noticed a 076-se-486 which I have not come across before. It was done by SBS6583X that day though I’m quite sure 6583X perms 076-se-402
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


I haven’t seen 3099G around, likely back to 852 as you said. I’ve noticed 3098J on 852 too. 3099G slot on 265 and the E duty permed by 5102H always having random replacement, 5102H keeps running around on AM-PM duties as 5192Y and 6857G go MIA very frequently
== Bus allocation ==


For 265, 6003D also goes MIA very frequently and it’s usually replaced by an E6 A22. Lately 1096E’s slot has E6 replacement quite often as well. Other than that the usual other slots replaced by E6 A22s are 2002H and 6857G. But I haven’t observed any fixed patterns for E6 A22s on 265 yet. This is all excluding 1814A, which sticks to duty 4A/11P regularly.
Hi,


Haven’t seen 1202R at all since it went to 852. Maybe it’s still 852 perm and 3099G went back to 852 too? There’s one missing slot on 852 according to that sgwiki page
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.


In the morning, 3099G’s slot is behind 5190C, 265-se-411 if you want to take note. The past week it was always a random citaro on that duty and 5102H’s slot 265-se-418
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


Still not too sure about 265-se-451 but I’m sure it crosses over to 268 during weekdays am peak
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.


Jonathanchu
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 09:45, 10 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=725567"