User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SG1085L ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.
 
Themystery
 
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
 
Hi Lemon1974,
 
Saw SBS5085Z on 55 and SG1855G on 138. New buses for AMDEP / SEDEP respectively?
 
5102H and 5220A edited to 130 perm... I’m not too sure about 5102H but I’m pretty sure I’ve still seen 5220A around on 265 lately... weekend perm maybe, but I don’t think 5220A has any perm slot on 130 especially on weekdays


Jonathanchu
Jonathanchu
Line 33: Line 23:


Themystery
Themystery
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast
== Bus allocation ==
Hi,
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 09:45, 10 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.