User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TIB1152X 190 (talk | contribs)
 
(170 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Warning Point|19 April 2024|False Information (Cameo into Service 167)
==About Me==
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:


Including the clause that states Any "Double Decker" Bus to Service 167 where DD is Cameo and not perm.}}
#No spamming
#Be respectful to me
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me


==About Me==
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond.
 
Thanks
 
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]
 
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:
 
*SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected)
*SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A)
===Others===
* '''Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover)''': Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected
 
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,
 
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages
 
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.


== 858 DDs ==
Please wait for other admins to support your request.


To correct you regarding your message on Haram's talk page, they are not cameos. There are indeed downroute DD slots from around Khatib & Sembawang stations that are performed by crossover buses with effect from this Monday.  
Thank you for your understanding.


AirFan19
Regards


== 190 SDs count ==
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)


Based on my observation count on Sunday/PH, excluding interline/crossover buses from other routes(very likely for 190), SD count on Sun/PH seemingly tally up to 11 or near 11 during Peak hours. About 1-2 SD only perform PM. Thanks for helping to observe.
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==


== Observation for Short Trip 975B ==
Hi,
Hi, not sure do help to observe whether DDs on 975B on Sundays/PH is it from 975 or it run individually because based on observation, it seem to be their own bus. On PH I saw SMB3549A, SMB3614U and SMB5014M. Didn’t see them on 975 in the earlier part for the day at all.


Cheers!
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Latest revision as of 19:46, 27 April 2026

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.

Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)

Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:

  • SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected)
  • SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A)

Others

  • Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover): Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

  1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
  2. ban any user
  3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)

Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links

Hi,

Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?