User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
No edit summary
 
(154 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Warning Point|19 April 2024|False Information (Cameo into Service 167)
Including the clause that states Any "Double Decker" Bus to Service 167 where DD is Cameo and not perm.}}
==About Me==
==About Me==
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond.
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:


==Re: Picture==
#No spamming
Hi,
#Be respectful to me
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me


I solved it for you by converting it to png.
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.  


== Re:Important ==
Thanks


Hi,
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]


Just saw your message on my talk page. I would like to apologise for the harsh tone I spoke with.
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:


However, I would also like to point out that I **CANNOT** update former deployments for deployments that are untrue. This is a count of vandalism and as you know yourself, sgWiki has some people who intentionally vandalise the page with untrue deployments.
*SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
*SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
*SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
*SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
*SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)


Take SBS3921Z for an example, the bus has never been on the 117 roster and it was edited by an editor who never had reliable credibility. Hence, it brings out a question mark if the deployment was ever true. SBS3921Z has always been on 114 previously, but went into an MIA state, where it never left Hougang Depot. However, it is still rostered under 114 even when it was no longer seen on 114, hence, I did not make the change from 117. Because if I were to declare it on another service or a spare bus, it would be incorrect too, because on the timetable schedule, SBS3921Z is still under 114, but in reality, HGDEP deploys a random DD on that slot, mainly SBS3826R.
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,


I would also like to point out that I also do update former deployments for buses that are only true and rostered by the affected bus operator, please see the edit below for proof:
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages


https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Former_Deployments_of_Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_1)&diff=prev&oldid=619602
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.


You undid many edits of mine in the past, mostly due to former deployments. There is a reason why it was not followed, if not the liability would be on me, as I am the one who made the most recent change. I do also notice you tend to speak in a bossy tone, which I took offence to but merely kept quiet. I also would like to clear some information based on the remarks of this edit:
Please wait for other admins to support your request.


https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_NL323F_(Euro_VI)&diff=prev&oldid=604294
Thank you for your understanding.


I don’t owe you a living nor do you need to stroke your boss-like ego by saying “I'm not accepting this edit until you have updated the former deployments”. I don’t answer to you, you’re not anyone close to me, you’re just a random stranger on the internet.
Regards


Also, if you want to take this up to the admins, I have nothing to say. But I hope that admins can also see my point of view here.
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)


Thanks for reading.
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==


Regards,
Hi,
Haram
 
== Re: User:SMN4840M ==
 
Thanks for updating me on this. It is quite clearly not my account as I have only ever used this account and I do not even edit such things which are okay in the first place. Furthermore, the admin has already banned these accounts made by the same person so it should be fine now.
 
Thanks,<br>
LTA Bus Irrationalisation
 
== 184 and 302 bendy buses ==
 
Hi, do help to KIV if 184 and 302 bendy buses that are still interchangeable. Also I have seen some 176 perm buses running on 190 often/some days. Need help to observe if its still interchangeable thanks.


RobloxXF
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Latest revision as of 00:32, 6 November 2025

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.

Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)

Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:

  • SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
  • SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
  • SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
  • SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
  • SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

  1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
  2. ban any user
  3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)

Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links

Hi,

Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=710563"