User talk:RobloxXF

Welcome to my talk page

Hello, sgWiki users, welcome to my page. Before you can me a message in my talk page, I advise you to read the rules for my talk page first

Rules

1. Use the new topic if you want to start a message
2. Any harassment messages will be deleted
3. No typing in all caps
4. If you did not add this format == xxx ==, that means I dont know what topic are you talking about
5. If I sent the same message to different people like username 1 & 2, your message must come like this:
   == Re: xxx ==
   === from (username 1) ===
   Your message
   === from (username 2) ===
   and so on.
   Heres an example of how this should be formatted

If I did not reply, sorry I was busy doing with other stuff

From Hearmeout

Please stop adding nonexistent arrangement thanks

Re: 184 and 302 bendies

From Shinjuku184

Hi from my observation the 184 and 302 bendies are very likely to be interchangeable but I'll continue to keep an eye on them. As for 176 and 190, I have seen A95 E6 B2 and B9TL from 190 running on 176 but that was a while back.

Re: Hi for the 302 bendies, 8024 and 8034 were operating for the past few weeks but they seem to have returned to 184 and replaced by 8032. Random DDs like 6025C (301) has been running on 302 instead of bendies recently.

From TIB1152X 190

Most of the time, bendies seem to be in their respective perm services.

Also, if you realise, 190 and 190A morning Peak seems to have bendy crossover, not sure is from 184 or 302.

Interchangeable for DDs seem to be common between 176 and 190 but not really on 184. I would say 5018C act like a spare bus these days. Didn’t really see the crossover of 190 buses to 184 on Weekdays but other crossover from 190 exist such as 190x302, 190x180, 190x868E and 190x991 etc.

From Alphabetlorefan1

Hi, I dont think 184 and 302 bendies are interchangeable, but hopefully it might be, unless otherwise stated. I will observe it again at a later date. Also, with the 176 and 190 DDs, it is indeed interchangeable, I have seen these perm buses doing the reverse services at some days. Thanks.

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 21 August 2024, 19:00

Bus Service 991

Hi,

I am certain you go out during Off-Peak hours which explains why you didn’t see 991 SDs. There are 2 perm duties of 991 which is done by SDs, of which 1 of them perform crossover to Bus Service 975A in the evening. They depart CKI to Bukit Batok at 0800++ hours stretch of timing. 991 have never receive any downgrades/upgrades and neither did their schedule change.

About SMB244Z

Can you tell me when this permed 300? I have never seen it. If you think its wrong, I hope admin can revert your edit.

Thanks

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 7 March 2025, 19:21

Photo upload

Are the photos that you have recently uploaded yours? If not, I suggest you credit the original owner with a link instead of stealing the picture by cropping out the watermark.

Images of buses

I agree with what Hearmeout said about you uploading photos. Its either you took a photo of yourself or you take it from other website and upload it here without credit. Not that, you also tried to crop out images to hide the watermarks, especially the ones from Singapore Buses Facebook account, in which people have already credited the image you uploaded. I suggest you take photos of buses like how Alphabetlorefan, TTEDC and Wekelwrady did. I will leave CastJared to send several images of buses taken from camera by 3 users mentioned and hope you will understand. Take note

Here's the Example of Mine:

There is a summary there: https://www.flickr.com/photos/zinyew/50718954756/ @ Flickr

Reply: Regarding 61, 172, 983 and 991 buses

You might want to backtrack the information displayed on the 184 and 302 deployment lists. How was it possible for 184 and 302 bendies to be interchangeable back then when they were parking at 2 different places?

61, 172, 983 & 991 DDs were well known to appear around these services during their Bulim days. If you insist, why not you just indicate all these deployment as KJDEP 61/172/983/991, KJDEP 176/190, and KJDEP 180/188/972/972M/979?

Bus Deployment (KJDEP services)

Hi

Thank you for regularly spotting KJDEP deployment and update sgWiki. I notice a possible edit warring that may appear due to different opinion.

Let me share my few cents and see how you can come into concensious before the edit warring appears.

You had mention that the following groups are interchangeable, meaning it can appear on any services within the group:

• 61, 172, 983, 991
• 176, 190
• 180, 188, 972/M, and 979

The term interchangeable means that such bus are duty-roastered on these group of service, most likely weekly basis, meaning this week bus A appear perm on 61, next week bus A then perm 172 and so on and so forth.

Based on your daily description, you mention that it was randomly appearing on those group and not other service which indicate that it was not a spare bus.

I do notice that TTS deployment are somewhat of what you describe, for example, TTS 963, 965, 969 belongs to the same group. 169, 856 belongs to the other group, meaning buses that appear on 169 may appear on 856 randomly, bus seldom on other services.

As such, do you think is possible where SMRT KJ practice FD like AMDEP in the past, with service grouping like I explain?

I do highly also believed that SMRT WLDEP also do pratice such grouping deployment.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2025 (+08)

Counting

Go down and count 307 how many bus before you tell me don't talk cock thanks

244Z: SP > 300 (KIV)

Reply: why revert back to old format?

Hello,

As previously mentioned by Supernutorcrazy, he will be transferring the updated layout to his own wiki, while sgWiki will revert to the original layout.

Thank you.

Re: Ban

Hi,

The old rule applied.

First Question, Do you or do you not state any comment. If not - simple. I don't ban people for stating in summary. There was an incident where I ban the wrong user and reapply to the correct user (due to comment). Next, removal of last former deployment (due to wrong info is still consider update, because you acknowledge that it is false and your current deployment holds).

I hope this clarify your accusation of me not reading summary before banning. (I do read even if without attention to me).

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2025 (+08)

SgWiki Guidebook

The admin deleted the guidebook because it was too strict on users so a new guidebook will be created based on users' feedback.

Reply: Bus Depot pages

Hi, sorry for the late response.

Yes, you may go ahead and create these pages.

Thank you for suggesting.